[PATCH V2 1/2] ARM: dts: Add DT changes for display on snow

[mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)]

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:34:32AM +0100, Ajay kumar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 06:34:33AM +0100, Ajay kumar wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 8:31 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:48:27PM +0100, Ajay Kumar wrote:
> >> >> Add DT nodes for ptn3460 bridge chip and panel.
> >> >> Add backlight enable pin and backlight power supply for pwm-backlight.
> >> >> Also add bridge phandle needed by dp to enable display on snow.
> >> >>
> >> >> Note that, snow doesn't support "chunghwa,claa101wb01" panel,
> >> >> but still we choose to reuse the binding since "chunghwa,claa101wb01"
> >> >> has similar LCD timings.
> >> >
> >> > What does it actually have?
> >> >
> >> > It's fine to have "chunghwa,claa101wb01" as a fallback but we should
> >> > have an identifier for the actual display, too.
> >> Actual display used is "AUO,B116XTN0", for which no data currently exists
> >> in panel file. Instead of adding a new panel_desc for B116XTN0,
> >> why not we reuse existing ones? what is the "identifier" you are talking about?
> >
> > The compatible string.
> >
> > So in the dts we'd have compatible = "au0,b116xtn0", "chunghwa,claa101wb01";
> Sorry, hardware engineer says actual LCD name is "auo,b116xw03".

Ok.

> > That way if we need specific data we can add it later.
> I think we can add a new panel_desc for "auo,b116xw03".
> Because its actual LCD dimension is 256x144, but "chungwa, claa101wb01" has
> LCD dimension 223x125.
> What is Thierry's opinion on adding this new LCD?
> 
> > What vendor is AU0? Can we add a vendor-prefix in parallel?
> its "auo" (already present: AU Optronics Corporation)

Ah, whoops. Mistook 'O' for '0'.

Thanks,
Mark.