From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: balbi@ti.com (Felipe Balbi) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:55:51 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 15/15] tty: serial: 8250: omap: add dma support In-Reply-To: <540048B4.7010807@linutronix.de> References: <20140815210211.GD9239@atomide.com> <53F5AF0D.5060409@linutronix.de> <20140821184416.GF10066@atomide.com> <53FE3779.5090908@linutronix.de> <20140827202313.GF16006@atomide.com> <20140828082348.GA5413@linutronix.de> <20140828164645.GG16006@atomide.com> <53FF84DF.7080406@linutronix.de> <20140828225454.GM16006@atomide.com> <540048B4.7010807@linutronix.de> Message-ID: <20140829155551.GD2620@saruman.home> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 11:32:36AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 08/29/2014 12:54 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior [140828 12:37]: > >> On 08/28/2014 06:46 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>> > >>> Sounds like there should be some way to clear that state.. I wonder > >>> if omap-serial.c had something before it's DMA support was removed? > >> > >> Its DMA was removed? Like there was DMA support? > > > > Yeah see commit 494574304711a333386e7dd5fd3ebbc3b7024994... > > Interesting. I've been browsing that file and checking other trees and > never noticed that it was there at some point. I only saw the pieces > which looked it was there. it was known to be broken and unused. There was no way to even enable that code. -- balbi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: