public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from syscon devices
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2014 12:25:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140901112549.GM7374@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4121644.3haxjiIdIo@wuerfel>

On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 01 September 2014 08:49:18 Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Aug 2014, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> > > 
> > > Currently a syscon entity can be only registered directly through a
> > > platform device that binds to a dedicated driver. However in certain use
> > > cases it is desirable to make a device used with another driver a syscon
> > > interface provider. For example, certain SoCs (e.g. Exynos) contain
> > > system controller blocks which perform various functions such as power
> > > domain control, CPU power management, low power mode control, but in
> > > addition contain certain IP integration glue, such as various signal
> > > masks, coprocessor power control, etc. In such case, there is a need to
> > > have a dedicated driver for such system controller but also share
> > > registers with other drivers. The latter is where the syscon interface
> > > is helpful.
> > > 
> > > This patch decouples syscon object from syscon driver, so that it can be
> > > registered from any driver in addition to the original "syscon" platform
> > > driver.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > RFC patch [1] was posted by Tomasz Figa. This patch addresses some of
> > > comments given by Arnd to RFC patch, and further decouples syscon from
> > > device model. It also gives flexibility of registering with syscon at
> > > early stage using device_node object.
> > 
> > It would be helpful if Arnd gave this revision his blessing (Ack).
> 
> I never saw a reason why we don't take this all the way as discussed
> a few times: Completely remove the dependency of syscon on having
> a platform driver for it, and make it possible to just call
> syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle() without having to register
> it first.

I think this sounds like a good end-state.  Migrating over by
supporting both methods in this way does sound like the correct thing
to do though.  Doing so is likely to dramatically reduce the effect on
current users.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-01 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-22  8:09 [PATCH] mfd: syscon: Decouple syscon interface from syscon devices Pankaj Dubey
2014-09-01  4:28 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-09-01  7:49 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-01 10:37   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-01 11:25     ` Lee Jones [this message]
2014-09-01 14:24       ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-01 16:04         ` Lee Jones
2014-09-01 17:05           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-02  8:05             ` Lee Jones
2014-09-02  8:14               ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-02  8:32                 ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-09-02  8:34                 ` Lee Jones
2014-09-01 11:35     ` Pankaj Dubey
2014-09-01 14:18       ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140901112549.GM7374@lee--X1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox