linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 4/6] arm64: Add DTS support for FSL's LS2085A SoC
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:14:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140902101438.GC25092@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140902100531.GB25092@arm.com>

On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 11:05:31AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 07:07:40PM +0100, bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com wrote:
> > > > > > +	memory at 80000000 {
> > > > > > +		device_type = "memory";
> > > > > > +		reg = <0x00000000 0x80000000 0 0x80000000>;
> > > > > > +		      /* DRAM space 1 - 2 GB DRAM */
> > > > > > +	};
> > > > >
> > > > > Does that mean:
> > > > >
> > > > >  - This is "DRAM space 1", populated with 2GB?
> > > > >
> > > > > Or:
> > > > >
> > > > >  - The DRAM space can be populated with 1 to 2 GB?
> > > > >
> > > > > If the former, s/ - /: / for clarity.
> > > > >
> > > > > If the latter, it might make sense to move that into board-specific
> > > > > dts files. If this can be dynamically populated ideally the
> > > > > firmware/loader would fix this up (assuming it can probe the memory).
> > > >
> > > > If the former. I will fix it up in v3.
> > > 
> > > Ok. Out of curiosity, are there other DRAM spaces that might be
> > > populated?
> > 
> > Yes there is another DRAM space. The 1st one is accessible within 32 bits and
> > the 2nd one is accessible from 40-bit and above. However, I was waiting
> > for the 4-level ARM64 page table patches (from Catalin) to get absorbed, as w/o the
> > same we can access only a 39-bit PA and hence can have only 3-level page table limited
> > to the 1st DRAM region (which is accessible via first 32 bits).
> > 
> > Any idea, about the latest state of Catalin's patch ([1])? Has it made to linux-next?
> 
> The 48-bit VA support is in mainline but you wouldn't be able to enable
> it because KVM is still broken. Hopefully it will make it to 3.18-rc1.
> 
> But here we are talking about 40-bit PA range which should be fine with
> 3 levels of page tables. The only problem is if you want to idmap the
> memory beyond 40-bit (I don't know whether UEFI requires this but for
> kernel booting you wouldn't need it since the kernel image is in the
> lower part).

Ah, I confused my self (and thanks to Mark Rutland for telling me). If
your PA range spans 40-bit, the kernel linear mapping would have to span
40-bit as well unless we either implement highmem or compress the
phys_to_virt(). None of these are desirable on arm64, so it leaves us
with 48-bit VA (which will be enabled by default in defconfig once KVM
is sorted).

-- 
Catalin

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-02 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-28  9:55 [PATCH V2 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC Bhupesh Sharma
2014-08-28  9:55 ` [PATCH V2 1/6] Documentation: DT: Add bindings for FSL NS16550A UART Bhupesh Sharma
2014-08-28  9:55 ` [PATCH V2 2/6] Documentation: DT: Add entry for FSL LS2085A SoC and Simulator model Bhupesh Sharma
2014-08-28  9:55 ` [PATCH V2 3/6] Documentation: DT: Add entry for FSL Management Complex Bhupesh Sharma
2014-08-28  9:55 ` [PATCH V2 4/6] arm64: Add DTS support for FSL's LS2085A SoC Bhupesh Sharma
2014-08-28 14:56   ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-29 15:51     ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-08-29 17:47       ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-29 18:07         ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-09-02 10:05           ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-02 10:14             ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2014-09-02 10:27               ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-09-02 10:19             ` Marc Zyngier
2014-09-03 17:23   ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-03 17:53     ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-03 18:17       ` Geoff Levand
2014-08-28  9:55 ` [PATCH V2 5/6] arm64: dts/Makefile: Add support for FSL's LS2085A simulator model Bhupesh Sharma
2014-08-28  9:55 ` [PATCH V2 6/6] arm64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC in Kconfig and defconfig Bhupesh Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140902101438.GC25092@arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).