[PATCH V3 4/6] arm64: Add DTS support for FSL's LS2085A SoC

bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-09-20T20:35:24Z

Ping?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sharma Bhupesh-B45370
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 1:25 PM
> To: 'Arnd Bergmann'; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> Cc: Catalin.Marinas at arm.com; mark.rutland at arm.com;
> rob.herring at linaro.org; marc.zyngier at arm.com; Will.Deacon at arm.com; Yoder
> Stuart-B08248; grant.likely at secretlab.ca; Basu Arnab-B45036
> Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 4/6] arm64: Add DTS support for FSL's LS2085A SoC
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd at arndb.de]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2014 12:05 AM
> > To: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: Sharma Bhupesh-B45370; Catalin.Marinas at arm.com;
> > mark.rutland at arm.com; rob.herring at linaro.org; marc.zyngier at arm.com;
> > Will.Deacon at arm.com; Yoder Stuart-B08248; grant.likely at secretlab.ca;
> > Basu Arnab-B45036
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/6] arm64: Add DTS support for FSL's LS2085A
> > SoC
> >
> > On Wednesday 03 September 2014 20:43:12 Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/fsl-ls2085a-simu.dts
> > > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/fsl-ls2085a-simu.dts
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..3c0f953
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/fsl-ls2085a-simu.dts
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> > > +/*
> > > + * Device Tree file for Freescale LS2085a software Simulator model
> > > + *
> > > + * Copyright (C) 2014, Freescale Semiconductor
> > > + *
> > > + * Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@freescale.com>
> > > + *
> > > + * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
> > > + * License version 2. This program is licensed "as is" without any
> > > + * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
> > > + */
> > >
> >
> > One more thing, same comment as for the respective Exynos7 patch:
> > can this please be a permissive license, like GPLv2+MIT dual license?
> >
>
> Yes. I saw Russell's email in which he mentions that Linus is ok with
> using the MIT
> X11 licenses ([1]). However, I am not sure I understand the GPLv2+MIT
> dual license.
> Is it listed separately on [2], or is it a sum of the X11 + GPLv2 clauses
> mentioned in [2].
>
> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg358782.html
> [2] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html
>
> Regards,
> Bhupesh