From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nm@ti.com (Nishanth Menon) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 13:34:21 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 07/10] ARM: OMAP5 / DRA7: Enable CPU RET on suspend In-Reply-To: References: <1408716154-26101-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <1408716154-26101-8-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <7hbnr5dake.fsf@paris.lan> <53FE2BF2.3020006@ti.com> <20140827194156.GE16006@atomide.com> <53FE34D7.7040004@ti.com> <53FE3551.2080806@ti.com> <20140905211558.GA31011@kahuna> Message-ID: <20140908183421.GA31730@kahuna> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 20:23-20140908, Grazvydas Ignotas wrote: > On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Updated patch below: > > Do let me know if this is ok with folks. > > > > ---8<---- > > From 1b9e11834dac2bd75c396aa7495c806b027653fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Rajendra Nayak > > Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 15:46:44 +0530 > > Subject: [PATCH V2 7/10] ARM: OMAP5 / DRA7: Enable CPU RET on suspend > > > > On OMAP5 / DRA7, prevent a CPU powerdomain OFF and resulting MPU OSWR > > and instead attempt a CPU RET and side effect, MPU RET in suspend. > > > > NOTE: the hardware was originally designed to be capable of achieving > > deep power states such as OFF and OSWR, however due to various issues > > and risks, deepest valid state was determined to be CSWR - hence we use > > Would be great to have some more details here.. Sorry, I have no details that can be published publically. Lets say, "TI refocus"? > So there is no hope for OFF mode on OMAP5? Yep, There is *NO* hope for OFF or OSWR on OMAP5/DRA7. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon