linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC v2 5/9] KVM: KVM-VFIO: update user API to program forwarded IRQ
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 05:10:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140911031005.GF2784@lvm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1409575968-5329-6-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>

On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 02:52:44PM +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> add new device group commands:
> - KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_FORWARD_IRQ and
>   KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_UNFORWARD_IRQ
> 
> which enable to turn forwarded IRQ mode on/off.
> 
> the kvm_arch_forwarded_irq struct embodies a forwarded IRQ
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - struct kvm_arch_forwarded_irq moved from arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
>   to include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
>   also irq_index renamed into index and guest_irq renamed into gsi
> - ASSIGN/DEASSIGN renamed into FORWARD/UNFORWARD
> ---
>  Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vfio.txt | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h                   |  9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vfio.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vfio.txt
> index ef51740..048baa0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vfio.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vfio.txt
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ VFIO-group is held by KVM.
>  
>  Groups:
>    KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP
> +  KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE
>  
>  KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP attributes:
>    KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_ADD: Add a VFIO group to VFIO-KVM device tracking
> @@ -20,3 +21,28 @@ KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP attributes:
>  
>  For each, kvm_device_attr.addr points to an int32_t file descriptor
>  for the VFIO group.
> +
> +KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE attributes:
> +  KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_FORWARD_IRQ
> +  KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_UNFORWARD_IRQ
> +
> +For each, kvm_device_attr.addr points to a kvm_arch_forwarded_irq struct.
> +This user API makes possible to create a special IRQ handling mode,

  KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_FORWARD_IRQ enables a special IRQ handling mode on
  hardware that supports it,

> +where KVM and a VFIO platform driver collaborate to improve IRQ
> +handling performance.
> +
> +'fd represents the file descriptor of a valid VFIO device whose physical

fd is described out of context here.  Can you copy the struct definition
into this document, perhaps right after the "For each, ..." line above.

> +IRQ, referenced by its index, is injected into the VM guest irq (gsi).
                                             as a virtual IRQ (specified
					     by the gsi field) into the
					     VM.

> +
> +On FORWARD_IRQ, KVM-VFIO device programs:
   When setting the  KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_FORWARD_IRQ attribute, the
   KVM-VFIO device tells the host (or VFIO?) to not complete the
   physical IRQ, and instead ensures that KVM (or the VM) completes the
   physical IRQ.

> +- the host, to not complete the physical IRQ itself.
> +- the GIC, to automatically complete the physical IRQ when the guest
> +  completes the virtual IRQ.

and drop this bullet form.

> +This avoids trapping the end-of-interrupt for level sensitive IRQ.

avoid this last line, it's specific to ARM.

> +
> +On UNFORWARD_IRQ, one returns to the mode where the host completes the
   When setting the KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_UNFORWARD_IRQ attribute, the
   host (VFIO?) will again complete the physical IRQ and KVM will not...
 
> +physical IRQ and the guest completes the virtual IRQ.
> +
> +It is up to the caller of this API to make sure the IRQ is not
> +outstanding when the FORWARD/UNFORWARD is called. This could lead to

outstanding? can you be specific?

don't refer to FOWARD/UNFORWARD, either refer to these attributes by
their full name or use a clear reference in proper English.

> +some inconsistency on who is going to complete the IRQ.

This sounds like the whole thing is fragile and if userspace doesn't do
things right, IRQ handling of a piece of hardware is going to be
inconsistent?  Is this the case?  If so, we need some stronger
semantics.  If not, this should be rephrased.

> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index cf3a2ff..8cd7b0e 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -947,6 +947,12 @@ struct kvm_device_attr {
>  	__u64	addr;		/* userspace address of attr data */
>  };
>  
> +struct kvm_arch_forwarded_irq {
> +	__u32 fd; /* file desciptor of the VFIO device */
> +	__u32 index; /* VFIO device IRQ index */
> +	__u32 gsi; /* gsi, ie. virtual IRQ number */
> +};
> +
>  #define KVM_DEV_TYPE_FSL_MPIC_20	1
>  #define KVM_DEV_TYPE_FSL_MPIC_42	2
>  #define KVM_DEV_TYPE_XICS		3
> @@ -954,6 +960,9 @@ struct kvm_device_attr {
>  #define  KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP			1
>  #define   KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_ADD			1
>  #define   KVM_DEV_VFIO_GROUP_DEL			2
> +#define  KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE			2
> +#define   KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_FORWARD_IRQ			1
> +#define   KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE_UNFORWARD_IRQ			2
>  #define KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V2	5
>  #define KVM_DEV_TYPE_FLIC		6
>  
> -- 
> 1.9.1
> 

Thanks,
-Christoffer

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-11  3:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-01 12:52 [RFC v2 0/9] KVM-VFIO IRQ forward control Eric Auger
2014-09-01 12:52 ` [RFC v2 1/9] KVM: ARM: VGIC: fix multiple injection of level sensitive forwarded IRQ Eric Auger
2014-09-11  3:09   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11 18:17     ` Eric Auger
2014-09-11 22:14       ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-01 12:52 ` [RFC v2 2/9] KVM: ARM: VGIC: add forwarded irq rbtree lock Eric Auger
2014-09-11  3:09   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11 17:31     ` Eric Auger
2014-09-01 12:52 ` [RFC v2 3/9] ARM: KVM: Enable the KVM-VFIO device Eric Auger
2014-09-01 12:52 ` [RFC v2 4/9] VFIO: platform: handler tests whether the IRQ is forwarded Eric Auger
2014-09-11  3:10   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11  8:44     ` Eric Auger
2014-09-11 17:05       ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11 18:07         ` Alex Williamson
2014-09-11 17:08       ` Antonios Motakis
2014-09-01 12:52 ` [RFC v2 5/9] KVM: KVM-VFIO: update user API to program forwarded IRQ Eric Auger
2014-09-11  3:10   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2014-09-11  8:49     ` Eric Auger
2014-09-11 17:08       ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-01 12:52 ` [RFC v2 6/9] VFIO: Extend external user API Eric Auger
2014-09-11  3:10   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11  8:50     ` Eric Auger
2014-09-01 12:52 ` [RFC v2 7/9] KVM: KVM-VFIO: add new VFIO external API hooks Eric Auger
2014-09-11  3:10   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11  8:51     ` Eric Auger
2014-09-01 12:52 ` [RFC v2 8/9] KVM: KVM-VFIO: generic KVM_DEV_VFIO_DEVICE command and IRQ forwarding control Eric Auger
2014-09-11  3:10   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11  5:05     ` Alex Williamson
2014-09-11 12:04       ` Eric Auger
2014-09-11 15:59         ` Alex Williamson
2014-09-11 17:24           ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11 17:22         ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11 17:10       ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11 18:14         ` Alex Williamson
2014-09-11 21:59           ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11  9:35     ` Eric Auger
2014-09-11 15:47       ` Alex Williamson
2014-09-11 17:32       ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-01 12:52 ` [RFC v2 9/9] KVM: KVM-VFIO: ARM " Eric Auger
2014-09-11  3:10   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-02 21:05 ` [RFC v2 0/9] KVM-VFIO IRQ forward control Alex Williamson
2014-09-05 12:52   ` Eric Auger
2014-09-11  3:10   ` Christoffer Dall
2014-09-11  5:09     ` Alex Williamson
2014-11-17 11:25       ` Wu, Feng
2014-11-17 13:41         ` Eric Auger
2014-11-17 13:45           ` Wu, Feng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140911031005.GF2784@lvm \
    --to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).