From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:40:04 +0200 Subject: [RFC 4/4] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: adapt DTS for I2C slave support In-Reply-To: <20140911141257.GC5149@katana> References: <1410274470-12712-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <1410274470-12712-5-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de> <16809905.2REViph6WO@fb07-iapwap2> <20140911141257.GC5149@katana> Message-ID: <20140911144003.GD5149@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > b) could be seen as a configuration thing since the functionality > backend could be changed at runtime even. Come to think of it, not only the functionality, also the address can be changed at runtime. This makes me think it should really not be in DT after all. People will probably find out that it is possible to put it in DT, but it should not be encouraged and they should do it on their own risk. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: