From: paul.gortmaker@windriver.com (Paul Gortmaker)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: 3.17-rc2: root=/dev/mmcblk0p2 command line parsing fails
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 10:25:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140917142542.GA5225@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140917132002.GS12361@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
[Re: 3.17-rc2: root=/dev/mmcblk0p2 command line parsing fails] On 17/09/2014 (Wed 14:20) Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
[...]
> I think the problem may be 4dfe694f616e00e6fd83e5bbcd7a3c4d7113493d
> ("init: make rootdelay=N consistent with rootwait behaviour") which
> was merged during the recent window. This moved the delay after the
> saved_root_name[] handling. As we can see in the SDP4430 case, the
> order was:
[...]
>
>
> If ROOT_DEV was still zero, and root_wait was set (it isn't) we'd then
> try to re-evaluate ROOT_DEV. ROOT_DEV must be set to mount the rootfs,
> and we can see from the above failure messages that it was still zero.
> That works out, because this code would never be run with root_wait=false.
>
> The reason it used to work is because the delay came _before_ the first
> "if" above, so causing the first ROOT_DEV lookup to succeed.
>
> I think it may be better to move the root_delay handling either immediately
> after md_run_setup(), or we need to re-lookup ROOT_DEV after the delay.
> Paul, any thoughts?
After discussing it more on irc, it seems like moving the delay/wait
handling after md_run_setup [i.e. to the original location of delay vs.
the original location of wait] is probably best.
But, given as the original commit log indicated -- there may be a risk
of other corner cases subtly being broken by such a change, it is
probably best if we just revert the original now, and then try again in
the alternate location in the next dev cycle. I'll send a revert
shortly.
Thanks for diagnosing this.
Paul.
--
>
> --
> FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
> according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-17 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-15 4:06 [GIT PULL] SOCFPGA DTS updates for 3.17 dinguyen at altera.com
2014-07-15 4:41 ` Olof Johansson
2014-07-15 7:29 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-07-15 15:01 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-07-16 1:34 ` Jaehoon Chung
2014-07-16 21:05 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-08-14 18:47 ` socfpga mmc (was Re: [GIT PULL] SOCFPGA DTS updates for 3.17) Pavel Machek
2014-08-14 20:56 ` Dinh Nguyen
2014-08-14 21:02 ` Pavel Machek
2014-08-14 21:25 ` Dinh Nguyen
[not found] ` <20140826114707.GA16372@amd>
2014-08-26 21:00 ` 3.17-rc2: root=/dev/mmcblk0p2 command line parsing fails Dinh Nguyen
2014-09-09 11:49 ` Pavel Machek
2014-09-17 13:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-17 13:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-17 14:25 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2014-09-17 14:57 ` [PATCH] Revert "init: make rootdelay=N consistent with rootwait behaviour" Paul Gortmaker
2014-09-18 13:17 ` Pavel Machek
2015-04-09 9:42 ` rootdelay regression is back in 4.0? was " Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140917142542.GA5225@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).