linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: shijie8@gmail.com (Huang Shijie)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] mtd: nand: gpmi: add proper raw access support
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:26:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140917152609.GA2111@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140915221210.5d9871fb@bbrezillon>

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:12:10PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:43:02 +0800
> Huang Shijie <shijie8@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:38:41AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 11:36:24PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 02:30:50PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> > > > > This test validates what's returned by ecc_strength file in sysfs
> > > > > (which in turn is specified by the NAND controller when initializing
> > > > > the NAND chip).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Doing this should not imply knowing the ECC algorithm in use in the
> > > > > NAND controller or the layout used to store data on NAND.
> > > > the difficulty is that the ECC parity area can be not byte aligned.
> > > 
> > > Is there a problem with just rounding up to the nearest byte alignment
> > > and ignoring the few bits that are wasted?
> > 
> > I feel a little confused with the two hooks.
> > 
> > does the ecc->write_page_raw need to write the ECC parity data?
> 
> Depending on the oob_required argument, it might be allowed to
> overwrite the ECC bytes even if this implies breaking page reliability
> (which is exactly what's expected).
> 
> When using raw write with with oob write option the writer should take
> care of regenerating ECC bytes (which you said was impossible in GPMI
> case) or copying them from a previous raw read.
Thanks for the explanation.

If we do not write the OOB, should we write the ECC bytes?
The hooks should comment clearly about how to implement them :(

> 
> Here is a real example of what one could test with raw write + oob:
> 1) read a page in raw mode
> 2) flip some bits in the generated ECC bytes (or what you references as
>    parity data) (this case can actually happen in real life)
> 3) write the modified page in raw mode
> 4) read back the same page in normal and check that ECC correction still
>    works as expected
the nandbiterr test mode does the test as above.
But i think the multi-writes to the same page should occur only for the
SLC nand. 

I will read your new patch set carefully in this weekend.

thanks
Huang Shijie

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-17 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-10  8:55 [PATCH] mtd: nand: gpmi: add proper raw access support Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-11 12:09 ` Huang Shijie
2014-09-11 12:36   ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-11 14:25     ` Huang Shijie
2014-09-11 14:38       ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-12  0:45         ` Huang Shijie
2014-09-12 12:30           ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-13 15:36             ` Huang Shijie
2014-09-13 17:38               ` Brian Norris
2014-09-14 14:07                 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-15 14:43                 ` Huang Shijie
2014-09-15 20:12                   ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-17 15:26                     ` Huang Shijie [this message]
2014-09-17 18:16                       ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-29  1:22     ` Iwo Mergler
2014-09-30  8:04       ` Boris Brezillon
2014-10-02  6:52         ` Iwo Mergler
2014-09-11 14:29 ` Huang Shijie
2014-09-11 14:45   ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-09-12  0:40     ` Huang Shijie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140917152609.GA2111@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=shijie8@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).