From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Liviu.Dudau@arm.com (Liviu Dudau)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 14:36:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v9 06/12] ARM: integrator: Correct usage of
 of_pci_range_to_resource()
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdanh8vb2-jxVvhmYLXEcvaEKv+BCiom8sPkT3uX_dhG6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1407860725-25202-1-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
 <1407860725-25202-7-git-send-email-Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
 <CACRpkdanh8vb2-jxVvhmYLXEcvaEKv+BCiom8sPkT3uX_dhG6g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20140922133655.GR1994@e106497-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 01:47:16PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> > Previously, of_pci_range_to_resource() would return a resource
> > that contained physical addresses of the IO space even if the
> > IORESOURCE_IO flags mandate a logical port set of values. Now
> > that the function has been fixed we need to update the drivers
> > that were taking advantage of the old behaviour.
> >
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
> 
> I guess you know what you're doing so:

I hope so :)

> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Thanks!

> 
> I expect this patch to go through the PCI tree or so? Or do you
> expect me to funnel it?

It will go through PCI tree together with the patch that "fixes"
the existing functionality.

Best regards,
Liviu 

> 
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
> 

-- 
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world,  |
| but they're not |
| giving me the   |
 \ source code!  /
  ---------------
    ?\_(?)_/?