From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org (Matthew Garrett)
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:31:36 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v4 18/18] Documentation: ACPI for ARM64
In-Reply-To: <20140922194841.GA9868@amd>
References: <1410530416-30200-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
 <1410530416-30200-19-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
 <20140922194841.GA9868@amd>
Message-ID: <20140922203136.GA32156@srcf.ucam.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 09:48:41PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Fri 2014-09-12 22:00:16, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > +No code shall be accepted into the kernel unless it complies with the released
> > +standards from UEFI ASWG. If there are features missing from ACPI to make it
> > +function on a platform, ECRs should be submitted to ASWG and go through the
> > +approval process.
> 
> Surely this should be narrowed down somehow? Or is reading all the
> released standards from ASWG mandatory before patching the kernel now?
> 
> Spelling out wtf ECR is would be nice, too.

Explicit Change Request. These can only be filed by paid-up members of 
the UEFI Forum, so I suspect this requirement is going to be unworkable 
(there's plenty of ACPI support code for large x86 vendors which isn't 
part of any ACPI spec)

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org