From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 21:51:57 -0700 Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: mvebu: fixes for v3.17 In-Reply-To: <20140914083423.GV21986@titan.lakedaemon.net> References: <20140914083423.GV21986@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20140923045157.GB7487@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 04:34:23AM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote: > oops, resend to include the arm alias. sorry. > > Guys, > > Here's everything we've collected so far wrt mvebu. I don't see > anything else on the horizon atm. These have been in -next for a while. > > Please pull. > > thx, > > Jason. > > The following changes since commit 7d1311b93e58ed55f3a31cc8f94c4b8fe988a2b9: > > Linux 3.17-rc1 (2014-08-16 10:40:26 -0600) > > are available in the git repository at: > > git://git.infradead.org/linux-mvebu.git tags/mvebu-fixes-3.17 > > for you to fetch changes up to ace8578182dc347b043c0825b9873f62fdaa5b77: > > ARM: mvebu: Netgear RN102: Use Hardware BCH ECC (2014-09-14 04:17:13 +0000) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > mvebu fixes for v3.17 > > - kirkwood > - final driver cleanup of ARCH_KIRKWOOD removal > - fix DT based DSA > > - mvebu > - use BCH ECC for the RN2120 and RN104/2 nand chips > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Andrew Lunn (8): > cpuidle: kirkwood: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency > ata: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency > thermal: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency > leds: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency > rtc: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency > watchdog: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency > cpufreq: Remove ARCH_KIRKWOOD dependency > ARM: Kirkwood: Fix DT based DSA. > > Arnaud Ebalard (2): > ARM: mvebu: Netgear RN104: Use Hardware BCH ECC > ARM: mvebu: Netgear RN2120: Use Hardware BCH ECC > > klightspeed at killerwolves.net (1): > ARM: mvebu: Netgear RN102: Use Hardware BCH ECC Hi, We've been dragging pull requests for a while (we've both been busy). However, we're past possibly the last -rc and need to crank down in what we consider a fix to be. Are any of these strictly required for 3.17 or should I just queue them for 3.18 at this point? "Fix DT based DSA" seems from the description like it might be the sole 3.17 candidate? -Olof