From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thierry.reding@gmail.com (Thierry Reding) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:36:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 14/22] MIPS/Xlp/MSI: Use MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X irq In-Reply-To: <1411614872-4009-15-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> References: <1411614872-4009-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> <1411614872-4009-15-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20140925073608.GK12423@ulmo> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:24AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote: > Use MSI chip framework instead of arch MSI functions to configure > MSI/MSI-X irq. So we can manage MSI/MSI-X irq in a unified framework. Nit: s/irq/IRQ/ in the above. > Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang > --- > arch/mips/pci/msi-xlp.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/pci/msi-xlp.c b/arch/mips/pci/msi-xlp.c > index e469dc7..6b791ef 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/pci/msi-xlp.c > +++ b/arch/mips/pci/msi-xlp.c > @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static struct irq_chip xlp_msix_chip = { > .irq_unmask = unmask_msi_irq, > }; > > -void arch_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq) > +void xlp_teardown_msi_irq(unsigned int irq) Should this not be static now as well? Thierry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: