From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 14:10:51 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: efm32: drop selecting NO_DMA In-Reply-To: <1411640056.7866.5.camel@x220> References: <1411585151.19525.29.camel@x220> <1411640056.7866.5.camel@x220> Message-ID: <20140925121051.GM3755@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello Paul, On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:14:16PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Wed, 2014-09-24 at 20:59 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > > Actually, the only difference I found in the .config file was that after > > this patch the .config file contained > > CONFIG_ARCH_EFM32=y > > > > I have no idea why. Did I botch my test? Looking at the patch that introduced the NO_DMA select I think I just copied it from somewhere[1] without questioning it. It seems the symbol already didn't exist when efm32 hit mainline in 6d85e2b0b6bed6ae7070426d5e43174c593e075c. Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig Best regards Uwe [1] probably Catalin's 2.6.33 that introduced v7-M support initially. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |