From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:25:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner A80 support In-Reply-To: <1411570141-29960-2-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> References: <1411570141-29960-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <1411570141-29960-2-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> Message-ID: <20140925132527.GF15315@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:48:55PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > The Allwinner A80 is a new Cortex octo-core A7/A15 big.LITTLE SoC. > While it's processor cores and interconnecting bus are new, it > re-uses many peripherals found in earlier Allwinner SoCs. > > Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai > --- > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 5 +++++ > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c | 9 +++++++++ > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > index 1aaa1e1..72f222b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > @@ -42,4 +42,9 @@ config MACH_SUN8I > select MFD_SUN6I_PRCM > select RESET_CONTROLLER > > +config MACH_SUN9I > + bool "Allwinner A80 (sun9i) SoCs support" With the new naming scheme, I wonder wether it makes sense to have the A80 displayed here and in the machine definition. -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: