From: bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com (Bjorn Andersson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: qup: Fix order of runtime pm initialization
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:03:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140930200329.GV28481@sonymobile.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140930195923.GB26928@qualcomm.com>
On Tue 30 Sep 12:59 PDT 2014, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:53:24PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Mon 29 Sep 15:00 PDT 2014, Andy Gross wrote:
> >
> > > The runtime pm calls need to be done before populating the children via the
> > > i2c_add_adapter call. If this is not done, a child can run into issues trying
> > > to do i2c read/writes due to the pm_runtime_sync failing.
> > >
> >
> > May I ask in what case this would fail? I thought we tested this as we found
> > the faulty error check after calling pm_runtime_get_sync().
>
> This is a different kind of failure. If during probe, the children do some I2C
> activity, they will encounter issues with the runtime_sync due to the pm_runtime
> not being initialized. However, once the qup probe completes, everything works
> fine.
>
> The original runtime_sync issue revolved around the runtime_sync return value
> being misinterpreted due to the incorrect check.
>
Yeah, I just wondered why my testing didn't trigger this. But I suspect that
the answer is simply that the client I ran with did not do i2c accesses from
probe.
Regards,
Bjorn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-30 20:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-29 22:00 [PATCH] i2c: qup: Fix order of runtime pm initialization Andy Gross
2014-09-29 22:49 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-09-30 1:53 ` Bjorn Andersson
2014-09-30 19:59 ` Andy Gross
2014-09-30 20:03 ` Bjorn Andersson [this message]
2014-10-03 1:21 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140930200329.GV28481@sonymobile.com \
--to=bjorn.andersson@sonymobile.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).