From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] dmaengine: Move slave caps to dma_device
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 10:27:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141001082705.GF6884@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140927092846.GA5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:28:47AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 10:54:43AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > The previous code was relying on the fact that the slave_caps were to be
> > defined on a per channel basis.
> >
> > However, this proved to be a bit overkill, since every driver filling these so
> > far were hardcoding it, disregarding which channel was actually given.
> >
> > Add these capabilities to the dma_device structure, so that drivers can just
> > provide them at probe time, and be done with it.
>
> This is also buggy for the same reason as patch 6.
Indeed
> The only way to do this is to either have a flag day, fixing all drivers
> at once (which isn't going to happen) or leave the caps code as-is, and
> provide a library function which drivers can hook into the caps callback
> which retrieves the information from dma_device.
>
> That way, DMA engine drivers which are using the new method can just
> install the new function, and those which haven't been updated with
> capabilities can carry on as they are, and are detectable to drivers.
Which is pretty much the current behaviour, isn't it?
> What would be acceptable is to have the DMA engine registration function
> spot the lack of DMA caps function and print a warning at boot to
> encourage people to add it.
That would be an option too.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141001/d72be5ed/attachment-0001.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-01 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-27 8:54 [PATCH 0/9] dmaengine: Implement generic slave capabilities retrieval Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 1/9] dmaengine: Make the destination abbreviation coherent Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 2/9] dmaengine: Make channel allocation callbacks optional Maxime Ripard
2014-09-28 16:07 ` Vinod Koul
2014-10-01 8:39 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 3/9] dmaengine: Introduce a device_config callback Maxime Ripard
2014-09-28 16:13 ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-28 16:14 ` Vinod Koul
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 4/9] dmaengine: split out pause/resume operations from device_control Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 5/9] dmaengine: Add device_terminate_all callback Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 6/9] dmaengine: Create a generic dma_slave_caps callback Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 9:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-01 8:21 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 7/9] dmaengine: Move slave caps to dma_device Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 9:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-01 8:27 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2014-10-01 8:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 8/9] dmaengine: Mark device_control as deprecated Maxime Ripard
2014-09-27 8:54 ` [PATCH 9/9] dmaengine: sun6i: Convert to generic slave_caps Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141001082705.GF6884@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).