From: vgoyal@redhat.com (Vivek Goyal)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] arm64 kexec kernel patches V3
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:43:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141007134320.GD27464@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412290795.32313.14.camel@smoke>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:59:55PM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 15:08 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 02:27:56PM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> > > For a running system you can check the device tree:
> > >
> > > cat /proc/device-tree/cpus/cpu\@0/enable-method | hexdump -C
> > >
> >
> > So system I have supports spin-table method for cpu bringup. How do I
> > test your patches with that system. Are there any patches on your
> > spin-table branch which can make it working?
>
> If possible, check if there is a firmware update that supports PSCI.
>
> My spin-table patches are now out of date, and fixing those up is
> now low priority.
So psci method for cpu bring up is more popular as comapred to
spin-table one?
>
> I modified kexec-tools to only issue a message, but accept a device
> tree that does not have the new cpu-return-addr property that is
> needed for kexec on spin-table systems. Since the spin-table stuff
> is only for managing secondary CPUs, this change should allow you to
> test kexec with a 1st stage kernel built with CONFIG_SMP=n.
>
> Since the secondary CPUs will have never left the spin-table, you
> should be able to kexec re-boot into an SMP kernel, but you will
> not be able to do a successful kexec re-boot from there.
Ok, I can compile kernel with CONFIG_SMP=y but use maxcpus=1 for first
kernel and hopefully that works.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-07 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-25 0:23 [PATCH 0/7] arm64 kexec kernel patches V3 Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm64: Convert hcalls to use ISS field Geoff Levand
2014-10-03 10:51 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 21:56 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 10:13 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: Add new hcall HVC_CALL_FUNC Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64: Add EL2 switch to soft_restart Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm64/kvm: Fix assembler compatibility of macros Geoff Levand
2014-10-03 10:26 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 22:27 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 10:10 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: Move proc-macros.S to include/asm Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64/kexec: Enable kexec in the arm64 defconfig Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64/kexec: Add core kexec support Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 18:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-25 19:02 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 19:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-30 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-30 19:54 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-01 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-03 18:35 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 13:44 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 18:42 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 18:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 20:12 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 20:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-09 22:26 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-23 23:08 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-08 9:28 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-07 18:48 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 16:16 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 17:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 17:56 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 18:03 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 18:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 18:19 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 18:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 19:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-02 10:26 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-02 13:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-02 16:53 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-30 23:59 ` [PATCH V2 " Geoff Levand
2014-09-30 20:29 ` [PATCH 0/7] arm64 kexec kernel patches V3 Vivek Goyal
2014-09-30 21:27 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-02 19:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-02 22:59 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 13:43 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2014-10-07 14:06 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 15:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-03 21:16 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 13:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 18:29 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-08 9:42 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-09 3:21 ` Dave Young
2014-10-09 10:09 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-09 10:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-10 5:30 ` Dave Young
2014-10-07 15:22 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-07 18:28 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 18:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 20:07 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-08 9:52 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-10-08 10:07 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-09 9:22 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141007134320.GD27464@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).