linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vgoyal@redhat.com (Vivek Goyal)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] arm64 kexec kernel patches V3
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:43:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141007134320.GD27464@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412290795.32313.14.camel@smoke>

On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 03:59:55PM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
> 
> On Thu, 2014-10-02 at 15:08 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 02:27:56PM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> > > For a running system you can check the device tree:
> > > 
> > >   cat /proc/device-tree/cpus/cpu\@0/enable-method | hexdump -C
> > > 
> > 
> > So system I have supports spin-table method for cpu bringup. How do I 
> > test your patches with that system. Are there any patches on your
> > spin-table branch which can make it working?
> 
> If possible, check if there is a firmware update that supports PSCI.
> 
> My spin-table patches are now out of date, and fixing those up is
> now low priority.

So psci method for cpu bring up is more popular as comapred to 
spin-table one? 

> 
> I modified kexec-tools to only issue a message, but accept a device
> tree that does not have the new cpu-return-addr property that is
> needed for kexec on spin-table systems.  Since the spin-table stuff
> is only for managing secondary CPUs, this change should allow you to
> test kexec with a 1st stage kernel built with CONFIG_SMP=n.
> 
> Since the secondary CPUs will have never left the spin-table, you
> should be able to kexec re-boot into an SMP kernel, but you will
> not be able to do a successful kexec re-boot from there.

Ok, I can compile kernel with CONFIG_SMP=y but use maxcpus=1 for first
kernel and hopefully that works.

Thanks
Vivek

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-07 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-25  0:23 [PATCH 0/7] arm64 kexec kernel patches V3 Geoff Levand
2014-09-25  0:23 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm64: Convert hcalls to use ISS field Geoff Levand
2014-10-03 10:51   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 21:56     ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 10:13       ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25  0:23 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: Add new hcall HVC_CALL_FUNC Geoff Levand
2014-09-25  0:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64: Add EL2 switch to soft_restart Geoff Levand
2014-09-25  0:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm64/kvm: Fix assembler compatibility of macros Geoff Levand
2014-10-03 10:26   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 22:27     ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 10:10       ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25  0:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: Move proc-macros.S to include/asm Geoff Levand
2014-09-25  0:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64/kexec: Enable kexec in the arm64 defconfig Geoff Levand
2014-09-25  0:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64/kexec: Add core kexec support Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 18:28   ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-25 19:02     ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 19:08       ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-30 18:18   ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-30 19:54     ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-01 14:56       ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-03 18:35         ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 13:44           ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 18:42             ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 18:45               ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 20:12                 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 20:22                   ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-09 22:26                     ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-23 23:08                       ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-08  9:28                   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-07 18:48               ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 16:16       ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 17:36         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 17:56           ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 17:47         ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 18:03           ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 18:09             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 18:19               ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 18:31                 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 19:22             ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-02 10:26               ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-02 13:54                 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-02 16:53                   ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-30 23:59   ` [PATCH V2 " Geoff Levand
2014-09-30 20:29 ` [PATCH 0/7] arm64 kexec kernel patches V3 Vivek Goyal
2014-09-30 21:27   ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-02 19:08     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-02 22:59       ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 13:43         ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2014-10-07 14:06           ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 15:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-03 21:16   ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 13:40     ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 18:29       ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-08  9:42       ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-09  3:21         ` Dave Young
2014-10-09 10:09           ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-09 10:19             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-10  5:30             ` Dave Young
2014-10-07 15:22     ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-07 18:28       ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 18:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 20:07   ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-08  9:52     ` Leif Lindholm
2014-10-08 10:07       ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-09  9:22 ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141007134320.GD27464@redhat.com \
    --to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).