From: vgoyal@redhat.com (Vivek Goyal)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] arm64/kexec: Add core kexec support
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 09:44:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141007134450.GE27464@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1412361303.32313.24.camel@smoke>
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:35:03AM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> Hi Vivek,
>
> On Wed, 2014-10-01 at 10:56 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 12:54:37PM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote:
> >
> > [..]
> > > > > +{
> > > > > + switch (flag) {
> > > > > + case IND_INDIRECTION:
> > > > > + case IND_SOURCE:
> > > > > + __flush_dcache_area(addr, PAGE_SIZE);
> > > > > + break;
> > > >
> > > > So what does __flush_dcache_area() do? Flush data caches. IIUC, addr
> > > > is virtual address at this point of time. While copying pages and
> > > > walking through the list, I am assuming you have switched off page
> > > > tables and you are in some kind of 1:1 physical mode. So how did
> > > > flushing data caches related to a virtual address help. I guess we
> > > > are not even accessing that virtual address now.
> > >
> > > __flush_dcache_area(), and the underling aarch64 civac instruction
> > > operate on virtual addresses. Here we are still running with the
> > > MMU on and the identity mapping has not yet been enabled. This is
> > > the sequence:
> > >
> > > flush dcache -> turn off MMU, dcache -> access memory (PoC) directly
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand that why do we need to flush dcache for source
> > and indirection page addresses. Some information here will help.
>
> I think Mark answered this. The architecture requires us to flush to
> the point of coherency (PoC) anything that will be used after the
> dcache is disabled.
>
> For more info you can look at the section'D4.4.7 Cache maintenance
> operations' in the ARMv8 Reference Manual you can get from here (after
> registering):
>
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.subset.architecture.reference/index.html
Geoff,
So as Mark and I discussed need of purgatory code in other mails, are you
plannign to enable purgatory on arm64.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-07 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-25 0:23 [PATCH 0/7] arm64 kexec kernel patches V3 Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 2/7] arm64: Convert hcalls to use ISS field Geoff Levand
2014-10-03 10:51 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 21:56 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 10:13 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 3/7] arm64: Add new hcall HVC_CALL_FUNC Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 4/7] arm64: Add EL2 switch to soft_restart Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 1/7] arm64/kvm: Fix assembler compatibility of macros Geoff Levand
2014-10-03 10:26 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 22:27 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-06 10:10 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 5/7] arm64: Move proc-macros.S to include/asm Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm64/kexec: Add core kexec support Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 18:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-25 19:02 ` Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 19:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-30 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-09-30 19:54 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-01 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-03 18:35 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 13:44 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2014-10-07 18:42 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 18:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 20:12 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 20:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-09 22:26 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-23 23:08 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-08 9:28 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-07 18:48 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 16:16 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 17:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 17:56 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 18:03 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 18:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 18:19 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 18:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-01 19:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-02 10:26 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-02 13:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-02 16:53 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-30 23:59 ` [PATCH V2 " Geoff Levand
2014-09-25 0:23 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm64/kexec: Enable kexec in the arm64 defconfig Geoff Levand
2014-09-30 20:29 ` [PATCH 0/7] arm64 kexec kernel patches V3 Vivek Goyal
2014-09-30 21:27 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-02 19:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-02 22:59 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 13:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 14:06 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-01 15:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-03 21:16 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 13:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 18:29 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-08 9:42 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-09 3:21 ` Dave Young
2014-10-09 10:09 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-09 10:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-10 5:30 ` Dave Young
2014-10-07 15:22 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-07 18:28 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-07 18:09 ` Vivek Goyal
2014-10-07 20:07 ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-08 9:52 ` Leif Lindholm
2014-10-08 10:07 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-09 9:22 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141007134450.GE27464@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).