From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vgoyal@redhat.com (Vivek Goyal) Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 14:45:20 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 6/7] arm64/kexec: Add core kexec support In-Reply-To: <1412707320.32313.100.camel@smoke> References: <471af24b7de659a30a5941e793634bffec380cb9.1411604443.git.geoff@infradead.org> <20140930181840.GA24153@redhat.com> <1412106877.6630.45.camel@smoke> <20141001145602.GB13689@redhat.com> <1412361303.32313.24.camel@smoke> <20141007134450.GE27464@redhat.com> <1412707320.32313.100.camel@smoke> Message-ID: <20141007184520.GI27464@redhat.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 11:42:00AM -0700, Geoff Levand wrote: > Hi Vivek, > > On Tue, 2014-10-07 at 09:44 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > So as Mark and I discussed need of purgatory code in other mails, are you > > plannign to enable purgatory on arm64. > > Adding purgatory code to arm64 is low priority, and I currently > have no plan to do that. Users are asking for kdump, and proper > UEFI support, so that is what I will work towards. I think having purgatory enabled is very important here as in kernel you are hardcoding that one of the segments is DTB and doing all the magic tricks w.r.t putting a magic number. I think as an interface that seems bad. So I think atleast we will to fix the purgatory part of it. Thanks Vivek