From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: FP register corruption in Exynos 4210 (Cortex-A9)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:35:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141008083509.GD5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5434F387.804@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 05:19:19AM -0300, Lanchon wrote:
> for instance, you say that if an ISR uses the FPU it would corrupt user
> FP state. fine, but it is not that simple. what if the FPU was disabled
> at the time of interrupt? (ie: lazy restore did not yet happen in this
> time-slice.)
At that point, it depends on which kernel version you are using. Yes,
older kernels will just restore the state. Newer kernels will trap this
and complain.
> a plausible answer (which i am making up out of the blue) would be:
If you want to continue asking questions and getting answers, change
your attitude; I am not a child.
You should also consider *not* writing essays, but instead ask clear,
direct and to the point questions - in other words, short emails. Not
everyone has the time or the patience to read huge long emails, or
huge rambling threads of 50+ pages on web forums.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-08 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-07 21:48 FP register corruption in Exynos 4210 (Cortex-A9) Lanchon
2014-10-07 22:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-08 7:58 ` Lanchon
2014-10-08 8:19 ` Lanchon
2014-10-08 8:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-08 8:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-10-08 8:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-08 9:22 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-08 9:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-08 10:32 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-09 22:36 ` Lanchon
2014-10-09 22:20 ` Lanchon
2014-10-09 22:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-10 9:45 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-10 10:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-22 22:46 ` Lanchon
2014-12-22 23:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-22 23:42 ` Lanchon
2014-12-22 23:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-12-23 8:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141008083509.GD5182@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).