From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:56:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4] ARM: sun7i: add support for A20-OLinuXino-Lime2 In-Reply-To: <5437DC04.6070000@gmail.com> References: <20140928164337.GB15315@lukather> <54295711.9010901@gmail.com> <20140929132543.GC4081@lukather> <54296D8B.3080304@gmail.com> <20141002124807.GC4039@lukather> <5431C8EF.3070809@gmail.com> <20141006092049.GF4090@lukather> <54366326.3060303@gmail.com> <20141009195630.GJ19438@lukather> <5437DC04.6070000@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20141010135643.GN19438@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:15:48PM +0100, Iain Paton wrote: > On 09/10/14 20:56, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > Hi Iain, > > > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:27:50AM +0100, Iain Paton wrote: > >> This adds support for the Olimex A20-OLinuXino-Lime2 > >> https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2 > >> > >> Differences to previous Lime boards are 1GB RAM and gigabit ethernet > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Iain Paton > > > > Sorry for noticing this so late, but we sort the DT nodes by their > > base address. Could you respin this for another version? > > Sure, no problem, on it's way shortly. > > Is there any general rule for this sort of thing, or is this something > specific to sunxi? > > Asking mainly as I've been asked to do them alphabetically previously > by a different maintainer and that's esentially why I did it the same > way here. > > Everyone having different undocumented conventions seems likely to > become counter productive eventually. That's unusual, it should be a global convention at least for ARM. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: