linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RCU bug with v3.17-rc3 ?
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:25:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141010162531.GL12379@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141010135743.GB31348@saruman>

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 08:57:43AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 04:07:15PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:46:37PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 10:41:01PM +0200, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 11:26:56AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > > > alright, it's pretty deterministic however. Always on the same test, no
> > > > > matter which USB controller, no matter if backing store is RAM or MMC.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Those two undefined instructions on the disassembly caught my attention,
> > > > > perhaps I'm facing a GCC bug ?
> > > > 
> > > > The undefined instructions are just ARM's BUG() implementation.
> > > > 
> > > > But did you see the question I asked you yesterday in your other thread?
> > > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg368634.html
> > > 
> > > hmm, completely missed that, sorry. I'm using 4.8.2, will try something
> > > else.
> > 
> > seems to be working fine now, thanks. I'll leave test running overnight
> > just in case.
> 
> yup, ran over night without any problems.

Right, so GCC 4.8.{1,2} are totally unsuitable for kernel building (and
it seems that this has been known about for some time.)

We can blacklist these GCC versions quite easily.  We already have GCC
3.3 blacklisted, and it's trivial to add others.  I would want to include
some proper details about the bug, just like the other existing entries
we already have in asm-offsets.c, where we name the functions that the
compiler is known to break where appropriate.

However, I'm rather annoyed that there are people here who have known
for some time that GCC 4.8.1 and GCC 4.8.2 _can_ lead to filesystem
corruption, and have sat on their backsides doing nothing about getting
it blacklisted for something like a year.

When people talk about the ARM community being dysfunctional... well,
this kind of irresponsible behaviour just gives them more fodder to
throw at us.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-10 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20140904184021.GA13421@saruman.home>
     [not found] ` <20140904191642.GJ5001@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found]   ` <20140904192535.GJ13421@saruman.home>
     [not found]     ` <20140904200403.GL13421@saruman.home>
     [not found]       ` <20140905213216.GD5001@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2014-10-08 17:13         ` RCU bug with v3.17-rc3 ? Felipe Balbi
2014-10-08 17:57           ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-08 21:29             ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-09 16:01               ` Johannes Weiner
2014-10-09 16:26                 ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-09 20:35                   ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-09 20:41                   ` Rabin Vincent
2014-10-09 20:46                     ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-09 21:07                       ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-10 13:57                         ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-10 16:25                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2014-10-11  1:44                             ` Nathan Lynch
2014-10-11  2:40                               ` Peter Hurley
2014-10-11  3:54                               ` Peter Chen
2014-10-11 14:16                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-11 14:51                                   ` Otavio Salvador
2014-10-11 18:15                                     ` Peter Hurley
2014-10-11 14:14                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-11 19:27                               ` Nathan Lynch
2014-10-13  9:11                               ` David Laight
2014-10-13 11:43                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-14  2:06                                   ` Greg KH
2014-10-14 10:27                                     ` Peter Hurley
2014-10-15 21:23                                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-15 21:25                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-19  9:54                                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-19 15:28                                           ` Felipe Balbi
2014-10-19 20:48                                             ` Olof Johansson
2014-10-09 21:47                     ` Aaro Koskinen
2014-10-10 16:18                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-10-10 20:52                         ` Aaro Koskinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141010162531.GL12379@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).