From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:47:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141022104742.GD22642@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413966107-11881-1-git-send-email-chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 09:21:46AM +0100, chai wen wrote:
> Idx sanity check was once implemented separately in these counter handling
> functions and then return value was treated as a judgement.
> armv7_pmnc_select_counter()
> armv7_pmnc_enable_counter()
> armv7_pmnc_disable_counter()
> armv7_pmnc_enable_intens()
> armv7_pmnc_disable_intens()
> But we do not need to do this now, and the return of idx is useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: chai wen <chaiw.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
It looks like the validation was moved out of all of these functions in
7279adbd9bb8ef8f (ARM: perf: check ARMv7 counter validity on a per-pmu
basis), and we just missed the opportunity to simplify callers at the
time.
It would be nice if we mentioned that in the commit message -- it takes
a while to figure out and it's handy for reference.
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> index 116758b..f66a9b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event_v7.c
> @@ -564,13 +564,11 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_counter_has_overflowed(u32 pmnc, int idx)
> return pmnc & BIT(ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx));
> }
>
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_select_counter(int idx)
> {
> u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 5" : : "r" (counter));
> isb();
> -
> - return idx;
> }
>
> static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
> @@ -585,8 +583,10 @@ static inline u32 armv7pmu_read_counter(struct perf_event *event)
> smp_processor_id(), idx);
> else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER)
> asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : "=r" (value));
> - else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx)
> + else {
> + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
> asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : "=r" (value));
> + }
Please make the braces consistent -- if one branch in an if .. else
chain needs them, they all do (see Documentation/CodingStyle).
>
> return value;
> }
> @@ -602,40 +602,38 @@ static inline void armv7pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value)
> smp_processor_id(), idx);
> else if (idx == ARMV7_IDX_CYCLE_COUNTER)
> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 0" : : "r" (value));
> - else if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx)
> + else {
> + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 2" : : "r" (value));
> + }
Likewise here.
Otherwise this looks like a nice cleanup to me, so with those changes:
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Thanks,
Mark.
> }
>
> static inline void armv7_pmnc_write_evtsel(int idx, u32 val)
> {
> - if (armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx) == idx) {
> - val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK;
> - asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val));
> - }
> + armv7_pmnc_select_counter(idx);
> + val &= ARMV7_EVTYPE_MASK;
> + asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c13, 1" : : "r" (val));
> }
>
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_counter(int idx)
> {
> u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> - return idx;
> }
>
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_counter(int idx)
> {
> u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> - return idx;
> }
>
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_enable_intens(int idx)
> {
> u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 1" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> - return idx;
> }
>
> -static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
> +static inline void armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
> {
> u32 counter = ARMV7_IDX_TO_COUNTER(idx);
> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c14, 2" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> @@ -643,8 +641,6 @@ static inline int armv7_pmnc_disable_intens(int idx)
> /* Clear the overflow flag in case an interrupt is pending. */
> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c9, c12, 3" : : "r" (BIT(counter)));
> isb();
> -
> - return idx;
> }
>
> static inline u32 armv7_pmnc_getreset_flags(void)
> --
> 1.7.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-22 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-22 8:21 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling chai wen
2014-10-22 8:21 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: perf: armv7: wrap unsupported arch init functions via micro chai wen
2014-10-22 11:01 ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-22 11:22 ` Chai Wen
2014-10-22 10:47 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-10-22 11:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: perf: armv7 remove useless return and check of idx in counter handling Chai Wen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141022104742.GD22642@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).