From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 11:02:21 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v1 1/5] mfd: tps65910: Convert ti, system-power-controller DT property to poweroff-source In-Reply-To: References: <1413991587-11110-1-git-send-email-romain.perier@gmail.com> <20141022155058.GN4939@x1> Message-ID: <20141023100221.GA10395@x1> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote: > 2014-10-22 17:50 GMT+02:00 Lee Jones : > > On Wed, 22 Oct 2014, PERIER Romain wrote: > > > >> This is related to the following subject "[RFC v3 PATCH 1/5] of: Add > >> standard property for poweroff capability" and depends on the > >> corresponding patch. > > > > Then it should be sent in the same patch-set. > > > > There's nothing I can do with this patch as is. > > > > Even if this patch is already commited and present in "linux-next" ? > (or in Mark Brown's regulator tree) Usually it wouldn't be possible to take this, as it would be difficult to ensure bisectability. The way we usually deal with this is to have a shared immutable branch between the effected subsystems, but we can only do this if the patches are sent as a set. However, it appears as though Mark has "of: Add standard property for poweroff capability" on a tagged branch on its own. This means, after checking with Mark that this branch in indeed stable, I can merge it in and base this commit on top of it. Not many people setup their repos like Mark does, so I guess you are lucky this time. Once I've heard back from Mark, I'll let you know when I apply the patch. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog