linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] arm64/efi: use UEFI memory map unconditionally if available
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:54:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141023155428.GA977@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1413997616.2985.74.camel@deneb.redhat.com>

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:06:56PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:21 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > On systems that boot via UEFI, all memory nodes are deleted from the
> > device tree, and instead, the size and location of system RAM is derived
> > from the UEFI memory map. This is handled by reserve_regions, which not only
> > reserves parts of memory that UEFI declares as reserved, but also installs
> > the memblocks that cover the remaining usable memory.
> > 
> > Currently, reserve_regions() is only called if uefi_init() succeeds.
> > However, it does not actually depend on anything that uefi_init() does,
> > and not calling reserve_regions() results in a broken boot, so it is
> > better to just call it unconditionally.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 11 ++++-------
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > index 51522ab0c6da..4cec21b1ecdd 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c
> > @@ -313,8 +313,7 @@ void __init efi_init(void)
> >  	memmap.desc_size = params.desc_size;
> >  	memmap.desc_version = params.desc_ver;
> >  
> > -	if (uefi_init() < 0)
> > -		return;
> > +	WARN_ON(uefi_init() < 0);
> >  
> >  	reserve_regions();
> >  }
> 
> It also looks like EFI_BOOT flag will be set even if uefi_init fails.
> If uefi_init fails, we only need reserve_regions() for the purpose
> of adding memblocks. Otherwise, we end up wasting a lot of memory.

What memory are we wasting in that case? Surely the only items that we
could choose to throw away if we failed uefi_init are
EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY and EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME?

We might want to keep those around so we can kexec into a kernel where
we can make use of them. Surely they shouldn't take up a significant
proportion of the available memory?

Thanks,
Mark.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-23 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-22 14:21 [PATCH 00/10] arm64 EFI patches for 3.19 Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 01/10] arm64/efi: efistub: jump to 'stext' directly, not through the header Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 14:47   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm64/efi: set PE/COFF section alignment to 4 KB Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 14:49   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 03/10] arm64/efi: set PE/COFF file alignment to 512 bytes Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 04/10] arm64/efi: reserve regions of type ACPI_MEMORY_NVS Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 16:15   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-22 16:33     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-28 10:17       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 05/10] arm64/efi: drop redundant set_bit(EFI_CONFIG_TABLES) Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-27 12:22   ` Will Deacon
2014-10-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 06/10] arm64/efi: use UEFI memory map unconditionally if available Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 17:06   ` Mark Salter
2014-10-22 17:20     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 17:29       ` Mark Salter
2014-10-23 15:54     ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-10-23 16:19       ` Mark Salter
2014-10-23 18:41         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-23 19:14         ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-23 19:23           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 07/10] efi: dmi: add support for SMBIOS 3.0 UEFI configuration table Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-27 15:26   ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-27 15:33     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 08/10] dmi: add support for SMBIOS 3.0 64-bit entry point Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 09/10] arm64: dmi: Add SMBIOS/DMI support Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm64: dmi: set DMI string as dump stack arch description Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-27 12:24   ` Will Deacon
2014-10-27 12:57     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-27 11:50 ` [PATCH 00/10] arm64 EFI patches for 3.19 Will Deacon
2014-10-27 12:03   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-10-27 17:45     ` Matt Fleming
2014-10-28 12:38       ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141023155428.GA977@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).