From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:54:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 06/10] arm64/efi: use UEFI memory map unconditionally if available In-Reply-To: <1413997616.2985.74.camel@deneb.redhat.com> References: <1413987713-30528-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <1413987713-30528-7-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <1413997616.2985.74.camel@deneb.redhat.com> Message-ID: <20141023155428.GA977@leverpostej> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 06:06:56PM +0100, Mark Salter wrote: > On Wed, 2014-10-22 at 16:21 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On systems that boot via UEFI, all memory nodes are deleted from the > > device tree, and instead, the size and location of system RAM is derived > > from the UEFI memory map. This is handled by reserve_regions, which not only > > reserves parts of memory that UEFI declares as reserved, but also installs > > the memblocks that cover the remaining usable memory. > > > > Currently, reserve_regions() is only called if uefi_init() succeeds. > > However, it does not actually depend on anything that uefi_init() does, > > and not calling reserve_regions() results in a broken boot, so it is > > better to just call it unconditionally. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel > > --- > > arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 11 ++++------- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > > index 51522ab0c6da..4cec21b1ecdd 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c > > @@ -313,8 +313,7 @@ void __init efi_init(void) > > memmap.desc_size = params.desc_size; > > memmap.desc_version = params.desc_ver; > > > > - if (uefi_init() < 0) > > - return; > > + WARN_ON(uefi_init() < 0); > > > > reserve_regions(); > > } > > It also looks like EFI_BOOT flag will be set even if uefi_init fails. > If uefi_init fails, we only need reserve_regions() for the purpose > of adding memblocks. Otherwise, we end up wasting a lot of memory. What memory are we wasting in that case? Surely the only items that we could choose to throw away if we failed uefi_init are EFI_ACPI_RECLAIM_MEMORY and EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME? We might want to keep those around so we can kexec into a kernel where we can make use of them. Surely they shouldn't take up a significant proportion of the available memory? Thanks, Mark.