From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bhelgaas@google.com (Bjorn Helgaas) Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 16:27:07 -0600 Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/2] drivers: pci: fix window allocation order wrt bus_range filtering In-Reply-To: <1414077787-20633-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> References: <1414077787-20633-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Message-ID: <20141023222707.GB11115@google.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 04:23:06PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > The number of windows allocated for the host bridge depends on the > bus resource. Instead of first allocating the windows and then > limit the bus resource, this patch reshuffles the code so that if any > limitation is applied to the bus resource it is taken into account in > the windows allocation. > > Cc: Will Deacon > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi Hi Lorenzo, I can *read* your patches just fine, but when I save them using mutt to apply them, they look like this: --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c @@ -276,17 +276,17 @@ static int gen_pci_parse_map_cfg_windows(struct gen_p= ci *pci) =09=09return err; =09} =20 -=09pci->cfg.win =3D devm_kcalloc(dev, resource_size(&pci->cfg.bus_range), I can work around this by downloading them another way, but it is a bit of a hassle. I *think* this is because your email has Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 which apparently confuses mutt. Any idea why this is? Anybody know how I can fix mutt to deal with this? Bjorn