From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: johan@kernel.org (Johan Hovold)
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:50:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v3] rtc: omap: add support for pmic_power_en
In-Reply-To: <20141028083633.GM2006@localhost>
References: <1413913086-12730-1-git-send-email-johan@kernel.org>
 <1414397368-26480-1-git-send-email-johan@kernel.org>
 <20141027154031.4492ea11d401045ca04a3ff8@linux-foundation.org>
 <20141028083633.GM2006@localhost>
Message-ID: <20141029125005.GB8823@localhost>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 09:36:33AM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 03:40:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2014 09:09:28 +0100 Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> wrote:

> But in general, how do you want to handle updates to a single patch in a
> series you already have in your tree? Do you prefer a proper
> incremental-fix patch (with commit message), just an updated single
> patch, or a resend of the whole series?

How should I best send the updated patch? Can you just replace the
current three incremental patches:

	rtc-omap-add-support-for-pmic_power_en.patch
	rtc-omap-add-support-for-pmic_power_en-v3.patch
	rtc-omap-add-support-for-pmic_power_en-v3-fix.patch

that you have in your tree, with a single new v4 which adds a more
elaborate comment?

Thanks,
Johan