From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: johan@kernel.org (Johan Hovold) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 14:00:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 00/20] rtc: omap: fixes and power-off feature In-Reply-To: References: <20141024194442.GG11455@saruman> <20141024195532.GF19377@localhost> <20141027162251.d7ff2a5f31917c638d4e47f7@linux-foundation.org> <20141028002552.GX12379@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20141028081616.GL2006@localhost> <20141028084745.GY12379@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20141028131257.GS2006@localhost> <20141028151610.GA12379@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20141029123418.GB2265@localhost> Message-ID: <20141029130050.GC2265@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org [ Please do not top-post. ] On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 01:55:49PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote: > Johan:. do you really plan to use this "poweroff-source" property ? As > you proposed a renaming few days ago... > I don't really want to waste time to propose patches to fix things > incrementally and rename it if the old one is used... Why would I want to use your retracted renaming proposal for this property (i.e. "poweroff-source")? These patches use "ti,system-power-controller" and the vendor prefix will be dropped when your patches have been merged. Johan