From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sre@ring0.de (Sebastian Reichel) Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:59:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Warn about deprecated legacy booting mode In-Reply-To: <5450EEE7.8070801@ti.com> References: <20141027200008.GR2560@atomide.com> <20141027230138.GB7805@drone.musicnaut.iki.fi> <20141028221243.GU2542@atomide.com> <5450EEE7.8070801@ti.com> Message-ID: <20141029185957.GA3723@earth.universe> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 08:43:03AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 10/28/2014 05:12 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Aaro Koskinen [141027 16:03]: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 01:00:09PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>> + > >>> + if (!of_have_populated_dt()) > >>> + pr_warn("WARNING: legacy booting deprecated, please update to boot with .dts\n"); > >>> + > >> > >> Maybe use WARN so that the warning is more verbose and kernel gets tainted? > > > > Well I was hoping to avoid annoying people with the trace. > > But can do that if people prefer that, what do others think? > > > > WARN is better and eye catchy. Also, could we add information on when > the support will be removed since we call it deprecated? I also think, that more eye catchy is better. Apart from that I wonder if we should drop support on a board-by-board basis and then drop omap3 support completly once all boards have been dropped. -- Sebastian -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: