From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:25:37 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] I2C: mediatek: Add driver for MediaTek I2C controller In-Reply-To: References: <1414561058-23803-1-git-send-email-xudong.chen@mediatek.com> <1414561058-23803-4-git-send-email-xudong.chen@mediatek.com> Message-ID: <20141030132537.GB23852@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > +obj-$(CONFIG_I2C_MT65XX) += i2c-mt65xx.o > > As it works for mt65xx and mt81xx series, better rename it to i2c-mtk.c That is a bit too generic IMO. It is likely that we will see some totally different I2C core from MTK in the future. Plus, it is not uncommon that a driver initially for SoC-X supports SoC-Y, too. Thanks for pointing out the other remarks. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: