From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 11:27:50 +0000 Subject: [PATCHv3 1/5] arm64: Add support for hooks to handle undefined instructions In-Reply-To: <1414435207-30240-2-git-send-email-punit.agrawal@arm.com> References: <1414435207-30240-1-git-send-email-punit.agrawal@arm.com> <1414435207-30240-2-git-send-email-punit.agrawal@arm.com> Message-ID: <20141105112750.GD32700@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 06:40:02PM +0000, Punit Agrawal wrote: > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/insn.h > @@ -354,6 +354,8 @@ bool aarch64_insn_hotpatch_safe(u32 old_insn, u32 new_insn); > int aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(void *addr, u32 insn); > int aarch64_insn_patch_text_sync(void *addrs[], u32 insns[], int cnt); > int aarch64_insn_patch_text(void *addrs[], u32 insns[], int cnt); > + > +bool aarch32_insn_is_wide_instruction(u32 insn); Nitpick: too wide function name ;). Maybe aarch32_insn_is_wide(). Otherwise the patch looks fine. Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas