From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:09:29 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM: sun8i: Add DMA controller support
In-Reply-To: <CAGb2v66m6Q=YX04Yez7HD=P1G5+G_0ej2tAw9dCJMBb+EHpz1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1411010680-4481-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org>
 <CAGb2v65ZkBvqSjwR0bVUu0-=5-pOmydp51K6GeMnxOa4vOtCRQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141106071123.GV1870@intel.com>
 <CAGb2v66m6Q=YX04Yez7HD=P1G5+G_0ej2tAw9dCJMBb+EHpz1g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20141106083929.GY1870@intel.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 03:54:35PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > The patches look fine to me so I tried applying them but they fail to apply,
> > can you please rebase these two and resend
> 
> Hi Vinod,
> 
> Could you publish an updated slave-dma/next branch? Currently I see it at
> v3.18-rc1. And the series rebases cleanly onto it with no differences.
> 
> I'm guessing some of Maxime's cleanup work is the source of conflict.
Its pushed now..

-- 
~Vinod