linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/10] arm64 kexec kernel patches V5
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 10:16:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141107101642.GA4585@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACxGe6u=J_k3XZxyiyti=i=rtW+a5xxuukg3TgOyM+ra1vAACQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:41:45AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 01:56:42AM +0000, Dave Young wrote:
> >> On 11/03/14 at 07:46pm, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 07:52:09AM +0000, Dave Young wrote:
> >> > > Hi Geoff
> >> > >
> >> > > I tested your patches. The macihne is using spin-table cpu enable method
> >> > > so I tried maxcpus=1 as you suggested.
> >> > >
> >> > > There's below issues for me, thoughts?
> >> > >
> >> > > 1. For acpi booting there's no /proc/device-tree so kexec can not find dtb
> >> > > to use.
> >> >
> >> > Are you absolutely certain of this?
> >> >
> >> > To use ACPI, you must have booted via EFI, as the only mechanism for
> >> > finding the ACPI tables is via EFI. If booted via EFI, the stub will
> >> > have created a stub DTB if there is no provided DTB, to pass the command
> >> > line and pointers to EFI data structures. This stub DTB should be
> >> > present in the usual place.
> >>
> >> Mark, I used kexec-tools from Geoff's git tree, it will create dtb from procfs
> >> maybe I can pass external dtb to kexec-tools. What you mentioned should be true
> >> though but I have not get idea how to get the dtb which kernel is using for boot
> >> since it is not unflattened.
> >
> > Ah, sorry. I see the problem now. For ACPI you don't unflatten the tree,
> > so there's nothing to expose at in sysfs/procfs.
> >
> > Somehow we need to unflatten the DTB without exposing it to drivers,
> > such that it can be exposed to userspace in the usual place but drivers
> > don't being probing based off of it.
> 
> Is that even necessary? If the tree isn't unflattened, then it is just
> a stub tree. There really isn't anything interesting in it.

We need to UEFI properties [1] from /chosen to access the memory map and
system table (both of which are necessary to access any ACPI tables).

> Kexec should recreate the tree from scratch in that case.

I'm not sure if the required information is exposed to userspace
elsewhere. Ard, Leif?

Mark.

[1] Documentation/arm/uefi.txt

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-07 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-10-23 23:10 [PATCH 00/10] arm64 kexec kernel patches V5 Geoff Levand
2014-10-23 23:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm64: Convert hcalls to use ISS field Geoff Levand
2014-10-23 23:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] arm64: Move proc-macros.S to include/asm Geoff Levand
2014-10-23 23:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] arm64: Add new hcall HVC_CALL_FUNC Geoff Levand
2014-10-23 23:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] arm64: Convert dts to use reserved-memory nodes Geoff Levand
2014-10-24 10:51   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-24 10:59     ` Grant Likely
2014-10-24 12:27       ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-24 14:45         ` Grant Likely
2014-10-31 23:44         ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-03 20:02           ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-03 22:26           ` Rob Herring
2014-11-04 11:35             ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-04 11:37             ` Grant Likely
2014-10-23 23:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] arm64/kvm: Fix assembler compatibility of macros Geoff Levand
2014-10-24  9:24   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-27 12:13     ` Will Deacon
2014-10-27 12:45       ` Christoffer Dall
2014-10-31 23:06       ` [PATCH V2 " Geoff Levand
2014-10-23 23:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] arm64: Add EL2 switch to soft_restart Geoff Levand
2014-10-24 10:57   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-31 23:47     ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-23 23:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] arm64/kexec: Add core kexec support Geoff Levand
2014-10-24 10:28   ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-13  2:19     ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-17 16:38       ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-17 20:20         ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-07 11:01   ` Arun Chandran
2014-11-12 21:54     ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-13  9:52       ` Arun Chandran
2014-11-17  3:52       ` Dave Young
2014-10-23 23:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] arm64: Update booting.txt to reserved-memory nodes Geoff Levand
2014-10-24 10:54   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-24 11:04     ` Grant Likely
2014-10-24 12:18       ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-24 13:54         ` Grant Likely
2014-10-24 14:10           ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-24 14:47             ` Grant Likely
2014-10-23 23:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm64/kexec: Add pr_devel output Geoff Levand
2014-10-23 23:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] arm64/kexec: Enable kexec in the arm64 defconfig Geoff Levand
2014-10-24 10:31   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-31 23:50     ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-03 20:05       ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-04  1:49         ` Geoff Levand
2014-10-31  7:52 ` [PATCH 00/10] arm64 kexec kernel patches V5 Dave Young
2014-10-31 23:25   ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-06  2:01     ` Dave Young
2014-11-13  8:37     ` Dave Young
2014-11-13 23:50       ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-17  3:49         ` Dave Young
2014-11-03 19:46   ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-06  1:56     ` Dave Young
2014-11-06 15:08       ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-07  0:41         ` Grant Likely
2014-11-07 10:16           ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2014-11-07 10:41             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-11-07 10:45               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-11-07 10:46                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-11-07 11:35               ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-07 11:42                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2014-11-07 22:34                 ` Grant Likely
2014-11-06 12:16 ` Arun Chandran
2014-11-06 15:28   ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-06 16:13     ` Arun Chandran
2014-11-06 18:25       ` Geoff Levand
2014-11-07  6:26         ` Arun Chandran
2014-11-06 18:39       ` Mark Rutland
2014-11-07  6:36         ` Arun Chandran
2014-11-10  7:17       ` Dave Young
2014-11-10  8:35         ` Arun Chandran
2014-11-10  9:24           ` Dave Young
2014-11-12  9:56           ` Dave Young

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141107101642.GA4585@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).