From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 18:51:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] clk: at91: usb: fix at91sam9x5 recalc, round and set rate In-Reply-To: <1415179995-25062-3-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> References: <1415179995-25062-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1415179995-25062-3-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20141107175139.GF4068@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 05/11/2014 at 10:33:15 +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote : > First check for rate == 0 in set_rate and round_rate to avoid div by zero. > Then, in order to get the closest rate, round all divisions to the closest > result instead of rounding them down. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > --- > drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c > index 5b3b63c..7980e8c 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c > @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ static unsigned long at91sam9x5_clk_usb_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > > tmp = pmc_read(pmc, AT91_PMC_USB); > usbdiv = (tmp & AT91_PMC_OHCIUSBDIV) >> SAM9X5_USB_DIV_SHIFT; > - return parent_rate / (usbdiv + 1); > + > + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(parent_rate, (usbdiv + 1)); > } > > static long at91sam9x5_clk_usb_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > @@ -62,19 +63,19 @@ static long at91sam9x5_clk_usb_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > unsigned long bestrate; > unsigned long tmp; > > + if (!rate) > + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(*parent_rate, SAM9X5_USB_MAX_DIV + 1); > + Maybe I'm missing something but I would return -EINVAL here. > if (rate >= *parent_rate) > return *parent_rate; > > - div = *parent_rate / rate; > - if (div >= SAM9X5_USB_MAX_DIV) > - return *parent_rate / (SAM9X5_USB_MAX_DIV + 1); > + div = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(*parent_rate, rate); > + if (div > SAM9X5_USB_MAX_DIV + 1) > + div = SAM9X5_USB_MAX_DIV + 1; > + else if (!div) > + div = 1; In that case, you are also screwed, I would return -EINVAL. > > - bestrate = *parent_rate / div; > - tmp = *parent_rate / (div + 1); > - if (bestrate - rate > rate - tmp) > - bestrate = tmp; > - > - return bestrate; > + return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(*parent_rate, div); > } > > static int at91sam9x5_clk_usb_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index) > @@ -106,9 +107,13 @@ static int at91sam9x5_clk_usb_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate, > u32 tmp; > struct at91sam9x5_clk_usb *usb = to_at91sam9x5_clk_usb(hw); > struct at91_pmc *pmc = usb->pmc; > - unsigned long div = parent_rate / rate; > + unsigned long div; > > - if (parent_rate % rate || div < 1 || div >= SAM9X5_USB_MAX_DIV) > + if (!rate) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + div = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(parent_rate, rate); > + if (div > SAM9X5_USB_MAX_DIV + 1 || !div) > return -EINVAL; > > tmp = pmc_read(pmc, AT91_PMC_USB) & ~AT91_PMC_OHCIUSBDIV; > -- > 1.9.1 > -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com