From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com (Antoine Tenart) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 11:01:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v7 08/13] usb: chipidea: add a usb2 driver for ci13xxx In-Reply-To: <20141114211334.GF16388@saruman> References: <1415978763-27345-1-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <1415978763-27345-9-git-send-email-antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com> <20141114210832.GE16388@saruman> <20141114211052.GA8105@kwain> <20141114211334.GF16388@saruman> Message-ID: <20141117100109.GA20934@kwain> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Felipe, On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:13:34PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 10:10:52PM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 03:08:32PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 04:25:58PM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote: > > > > Add a USB2 ChipIdea driver for ci13xxx, with optional PHY, clock > > > > and DMA mask, to support USB2 ChipIdea controllers that don't need > > > > specific functions. > > > > > > > > Tested on the Marvell Berlin SoCs USB controllers. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart > > > > --- > > > > drivers/usb/chipidea/Makefile | 1 + > > > > drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_usb2.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+) > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_usb2.c > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Makefile b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Makefile > > > > index 2f099c7df7b5..1fc86a2ca22d 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/Makefile > > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/Makefile > > > > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ ci_hdrc-$(CONFIG_USB_OTG_FSM) += otg_fsm.o > > > > > > > > # Glue/Bridge layers go here > > > > > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA) += ci_hdrc_usb2.o > > > > > > usb2 is too generic, you should call it ci_hdcr_marvell, or something > > > like that. > > > > This driver is generic, and not only for Marvell Berlin SoCs. It is part > > of the Berlin USB series as it is the first SoC to use it but Xilinx can > > also use it for example. > > then how about ci_hdrc_generic.c ? We had this discussion during in the v2 thread of this series[1]. I tend to prefer not using the 'generic' keyword. I think using 'usb2' is generic enough here. Antoine [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/6/24/197 -- Antoine T?nart, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com