From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: nsz@port70.net (Szabolcs Nagy) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:11:23 +0100 Subject: ARM atomics overhaul for musl In-Reply-To: <20141117135412.GC29595@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> References: <20141116055656.GA13940@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20141116163355.GK4042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20141116165017.GT22465@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <20141116171055.GM4042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20141117135412.GC29595@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Message-ID: <20141117141123.GG10829@port70.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Catalin Marinas [2014-11-17 13:54:13 +0000]: > ARM11MPCore). ARM is trying to move away from architecture version > numbers, which are rather useful for marketing, to proper feature > detection based on CPUID. Whether there is an ARMv9 or not, it's > irrelevant to what Linux should do (i.e. use CPUID rather than guess > features based on architecture version numbers). > how to use cpuid from userspace? should linux export those bits into hwcap? (i assume all relevant info will be available in /proc/cpuinfo but that does not work for libc)