From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: mxs: implement get_direction callback
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 17:02:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141117160246.GL27002@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <546A1B17.4010600@elproma.com.pl>
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:58:15PM +0100, Janusz U?ycki wrote:
>
> W dniu 2014-11-17 o 16:53, Uwe Kleine-K?nig pisze:
> >Hello,
> >
> >On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:05:51AM +0100, Richard Genoud wrote:
> >>2014-11-17 10:59 GMT+01:00 Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
> >>>Hello Richard,
> >>>
> >>>>>>>>So finally the prototypes would be:
> >>>>>>>>int mctrl_gpio_request_irqs(struct mctrl_gpios*, struct
> >>>>>>>>uart_port*, irqhandler_t);
> >>>>>>>>void mctrl_gpio_free_irqs(struct mctrl_gpios*);
> >>>>>>I think:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> struct mctrl_gpios {
> >>>>>> struct uart_port *port;
> >>>>>> struct {
> >>>>>> gpio_desc *gpio;
> >>>>>> unsigned int irq;
> >>>>I think it's just "int irq;" there
> >>>irqs are unsigned. Some functions returning an irq use "int", but
> >>>depending on who you ask this only for error reporting or a relict.
> >>>Use 0 for invalid/unused in mctrl_gpio*.
> >>>
> >>>>>Yes. I tried to assign irq value in mctrl_gpio_init() only.
> >>>>>There was another issue if CONFIG_GPIOLIB is not defined but it looks mctrl_
> >>>>>disable/enable_ms()
> >>>>>and mctrl_ irq handler solve the problem.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Not sure there is a corresponding request_irq variant for that.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>What would you propose?
> >>>>In atmel_request_gpio_irq(), the function irq_set_status_flags(irq,
> >>>>IRQ_NOAUTOEN); is used before request_irq to prevent the irq from
> >>>>being enabled when requested.
> >>>I'm not sure this is allowed. How do you handle request_irq failing? (I
> >>>just checked: you don't.) Consider another thread just doing
> >>>request_irq($yourirq, ...) between
> >>>
> >>> irq_set_status_flags(irq[i], IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> >>>
> >>>and
> >>>
> >>> err = request_irq(irq[i], ...
> >>well, in this case, request_irq() will fail and all the previously
> >>requested irqs will be freed:
> >> /*
> >> * If something went wrong, rollback.
> >> */
> >> while (err && (--i >= 0))
> >> if (irq[i] >= 0)
> >> free_irq(irq[i], port);
> >Just in case you didn't notice: Your statement is right, but for the
> >other caller to request_irq there is something fishy. He gets
> >IRQ_NOAUTOEN without being able to notice ...
>
> Likely the gpio interrupts will never shared. We can say mctrl_gpio
> is the only owner
> of a gpio after a request.
Right. The important part of your sentence is: "after a request". So at
the time irq_set_status_flags(..., IRQ_NOAUTOEN) is called, you're not
yet owning it. At a minimum you must clear the flag in the error path.
I'd like to have a statement from Thomas here if this is considered OK.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-17 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-14 22:27 [PATCH] gpio: mxs: implement get_direction callback Janusz Uzycki
2014-11-14 23:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-15 19:29 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-16 21:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-16 21:48 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-16 23:59 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 1:58 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 8:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-17 8:38 ` Alexander Shiyan
2014-11-17 8:44 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-17 8:53 ` Alexander Shiyan
2014-11-17 9:11 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 9:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-17 9:46 ` Richard Genoud
2014-11-17 9:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-17 10:05 ` Richard Genoud
2014-11-17 14:29 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 16:14 ` Richard Genoud
2014-11-17 15:53 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-17 15:58 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 16:02 ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2014-11-17 16:04 ` Richard Genoud
2014-11-17 17:26 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 10:05 ` Alexander Shiyan
2014-11-17 10:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-17 10:10 ` Richard Genoud
2014-11-17 10:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-11-17 12:40 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 9:51 ` request an irq without enabling? [Was: Re: [PATCH] gpio: mxs: implement get_direction callback] Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-17 9:57 ` Richard Genoud
2014-11-17 17:00 ` [PATCH] gpio: mxs: implement get_direction callback Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 17:07 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 18:42 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-17 19:02 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 22:21 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-18 9:59 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 9:26 ` Richard Genoud
2014-11-17 14:45 ` Janusz Użycki
2014-11-17 15:59 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2014-11-17 8:31 ` Richard Genoud
2014-11-17 8:39 ` Uwe Kleine-König
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141117160246.GL27002@pengutronix.de \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).