From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pali.rohar@gmail.com (Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?=) Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:21:53 +0100 Subject: [RFC] adp1653: Add device tree bindings for LED controller In-Reply-To: <20141117150617.GD7046@atomide.com> References: <20141116075928.GA9763@amd> <201411171601.32311@pali> <20141117150617.GD7046@atomide.com> Message-ID: <201411171621.54895@pali> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Monday 17 November 2014 16:06:17 Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Pali Roh?r [141117 07:03]: > > On Monday 17 November 2014 15:55:46 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > There's nothing stopping us from initializing the camera > > > code from pdata-quirks.c for now to keep it working. > > > Certainly the binding should be added to the driver, but > > > that removes a dependency to the legacy booting mode if > > > things are otherwise working. > > > > Tony, legacy board code for n900 is not in mainline tree. > > And that omap3 camera subsystem for n900 is broken since > > 3.5 kernel... (both Front and Back camera on n900 show only > > green picture). > > I'm still seeing the legacy board code for n900 in mainline > tree :) It's deprecated, but still there. > Yes, it is there because conversion from board code to DT is not complete yet... It is slow progress but you can watch it on page http://elinux.org/N900 (last two columns). > Are you maybe talking about some other piece of platform_data > that's no longer in the mainline kernel? > Yes, about platform_data which were never in mainline kernel. Just only in other trees. That code is: camera subsystem (with all other devices), cellular modem, bluetooth, radio. > No idea what might be wrong with the camera though. > > Regards, > > Tony -- Pali Roh?r pali.rohar at gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part. URL: