From: edubezval@gmail.com (Eduardo Valentin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/21] thermal: of: Extend current of-thermal.c code to allow setting emulated temp
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:23:29 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141118152327.GB18674@developer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141107122035.2973ad20@amdc2363>
Lukasz,
On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 12:20:35PM +0100, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> Hi Eduardo,
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 06:38:40PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
> > > Before this change it was only possible to set get_temp() and
> > > get_trend() methods to be used in the common code handling passing
> > > parameters via device tree to "cpu-thermal" CPU thermal zone device.
> > >
> > > Now it is possible to also set emulated value of temperature for
> > > debug purposes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > include/linux/thermal.h | 6 ++++--
> > > 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> > > b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c index cd74e64..f206375 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/thermal/of-thermal.c
> > > @@ -98,10 +98,22 @@ struct __thermal_zone {
> > > void *sensor_data;
> > > int (*get_temp)(void *, long *);
> > > int (*get_trend)(void *, long *);
> > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned long);
> > > };
> > >
> > > /*** DT thermal zone device callbacks ***/
> > >
> > > +static int of_thermal_set_emul_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> > > + unsigned long temp)
> > > +{
> > > + struct __thermal_zone *data = tz->devdata;
> > > +
> > > + if (!data->set_emul_temp)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + return data->set_emul_temp(data->sensor_data, temp);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int of_thermal_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> > > unsigned long *temp)
> > > {
> > > @@ -352,7 +364,8 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device *
> > > thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node *zone,
> > > struct device_node *sensor, void *data,
> > > int (*get_temp)(void *, long *),
> > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *))
> > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *),
> > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *, unsigned
> > > long))
> >
> > Thanks for improving the API. However, looking at what is above, it
> > starts to be pretty ugly. And for sure, this is not the last callback
> > to be added.
>
> Presumably there would be some more callbacks.
>
> > I believe it is time to add a .ops in the of-thermal.
> > While in here, do you mind adding the .ops in a separated patch, then
> > add the .set_emul_temp in the .ops field?
>
> I will add an option to pass .ops with thermal_zone_of_add_sensor().
>
> I'm only concerned a bit about testing other users of of-thermal.
> I have only beaglebone black (BBB) for testing, which on-soc bandgap
> thermal sensor is very inaccurate and hence not supported even at BBB
> github linux kernel repository (v3.14).
>
> Because of above I would need your support for testing.
>
I did the .ops part that is required for your patch:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5329801/
As you already reviewed it. Do you mind refreshing your series on top of
it?
Cheers,
> >
> > > {
> > > struct thermal_zone_device *tzd;
> > > struct __thermal_zone *tz;
> > > @@ -366,10 +379,12 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node
> > > *zone, mutex_lock(&tzd->lock);
> > > tz->get_temp = get_temp;
> > > tz->get_trend = get_trend;
> > > + tz->set_emul_temp = set_emul_temp;
> > > tz->sensor_data = data;
> > >
> > > tzd->ops->get_temp = of_thermal_get_temp;
> > > tzd->ops->get_trend = of_thermal_get_trend;
> > > + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = of_thermal_set_emul_temp;
> > > mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock);
> > >
> > > return tzd;
> > > @@ -411,7 +426,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(struct device_node
> > > *zone, struct thermal_zone_device *
> > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int sensor_id,
> > > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void
> > > *, long *),
> > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *))
> > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *),
> > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *,
> > > unsigned long)) {
> > > struct device_node *np, *child, *sensor_np;
> > >
> > > @@ -453,7 +469,8 @@ thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device
> > > *dev, int sensor_id, return thermal_zone_of_add_sensor(child,
> > > sensor_np, data,
> > > get_temp,
> > > -
> > > get_trend);
> > > +
> > > get_trend,
> > > +
> > > set_emul_temp); }
> > > }
> > > of_node_put(np);
> > > @@ -494,9 +511,11 @@ void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct
> > > device *dev, mutex_lock(&tzd->lock);
> > > tzd->ops->get_temp = NULL;
> > > tzd->ops->get_trend = NULL;
> > > + tzd->ops->set_emul_temp = NULL;
> > >
> > > tz->get_temp = NULL;
> > > tz->get_trend = NULL;
> > > + tz->set_emul_temp = NULL;
> > > tz->sensor_data = NULL;
> > > mutex_unlock(&tzd->lock);
> > > }
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> > > index 0305cde..36010e9 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> > > @@ -290,14 +290,16 @@ struct thermal_genl_event {
> > > struct thermal_zone_device *
> > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id,
> > > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void
> > > *, long *),
> > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *));
> > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *),
> > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *,
> > > unsigned long)); void thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister(struct
> > > device *dev, struct thermal_zone_device *tz);
> > > #else
> > > static inline struct thermal_zone_device *
> > > thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(struct device *dev, int id,
> > > void *data, int (*get_temp)(void
> > > *, long *),
> > > - int (*get_trend)(void *, long *))
> > > + int (*get_trend)(void *, long *),
> > > + int (*set_emul_temp)(void *,
> > > unsigned long)) {
> > > return NULL;
> > > }
> > > --
> > > 2.0.0.rc2
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Lukasz Majewski
>
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland (SRPOL) | Linux Platform Group
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141118/79194856/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-18 15:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-10-09 16:38 [PATCH 00/21] thermal: exynos: Thermal code rework to use device tree Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 01/21] thermal: of: Extend of-thermal.c to provide number of trip points Lukasz Majewski
2014-11-07 1:34 ` Eduardo Valentin
2014-11-07 9:14 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 02/21] thermal: of: Extend of-thermal.c to provide check if trip point is enabled Lukasz Majewski
2014-11-07 1:37 ` Eduardo Valentin
2014-11-07 9:15 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 03/21] thermal: of: Extend of-thermal.c to provide number of non critical trip points Lukasz Majewski
2014-11-07 1:41 ` Eduardo Valentin
2014-11-07 10:05 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-11-07 16:06 ` Eduardo Valentin
2014-11-07 16:43 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-11-12 9:42 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-11-18 15:20 ` Eduardo Valentin
2014-11-18 20:25 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-11-07 23:04 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 04/21] thermal: of: Extend current of-thermal.c code to allow setting emulated temp Lukasz Majewski
2014-11-07 1:44 ` Eduardo Valentin
2014-11-07 11:20 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-11-18 15:23 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
2014-11-18 20:28 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 05/21] thermal: exynos: cosmetic: Correct comment format Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 06/21] thermal: exynos: Provide thermal_exynos.h file to be included in device tree files Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 07/21] thermal: dts: trats: Enable TMU on the Exynos4210 trats device Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 08/21] thermal: dts: exynos: Adding LD010 regulator node necessary for TMU on Odroid U3 board Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 09/21] thermal: dts: Provide bindings and enable TMU at Exynos4x12 devices Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 10/21] thermal: cpu_cooling: dts: Define device tree bindings for Exynos cpu cooling functionality Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 11/21] thermal: cpu_cooling: Modify exynos thermal code to use device tree for cpu cooling configuration Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 12/21] thermal: exynos: dts: Add default definition for the TMU sensor Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 13/21] thermal: dts: Default trip points definition for Exynos5420 SoCs Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 14/21] thermal: exynos: dts: Define default thermal-zones for Exynos4 Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 15/21] thermal: dts: exynos: Trip points and sensor configuration data for Exynos5440 Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 16/21] thermal: exynos: dts: Provide device tree bindings identical to one in exynos_tmu_data.c Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 17/21] thermal: samsung: core: Exynos TMU rework to use device tree for configuration Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 18/21] thermal: exynos: Remove exynos_thermal_common.[c|h] files Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 19/21] thermal: exynos: Remove exynos_tmu_data.c file Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 20/21] thermal: exynos: Make Exynos5250 TMU compatible with Exynos4412 Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 16:38 ` [PATCH 21/21] thermal: exynos: Make Exynos3250 " Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-09 23:34 ` Chanwoo Choi
2014-10-10 8:51 ` Lukasz Majewski
2014-10-23 8:50 ` [PATCH 00/21] thermal: exynos: Thermal code rework to use device tree Lukasz Majewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141118152327.GB18674@developer \
--to=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).