From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 00:07:36 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v9 05/13] arm: introduce is_device_dma_coherent
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1411181649000.27247@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1411121130020.26318@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
 <1415792454-23161-5-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1411141158560.26318@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.02.1411181649000.27247@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
Message-ID: <20141120000736.GN4042@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 04:49:21PM +0000, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> ping?

Sending something which wants my attention _To:_ me is always a good idea :)

The patch is fine in itself, but I have a niggle about the
is_device_dma_coherent() - provided this is only used in architecture
specific code, that should be fine.  It could probably do with a comment
to that effect in an attempt to discourage drivers using it (thereby
becoming less portable to other architectures.)

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.