From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 08:18:22 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] drivers: bus: Move omap gpmc code to live under drivers In-Reply-To: <3449576.YFhSXUYQOn@wuerfel> References: <1416522501-14999-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <1416522501-14999-4-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <546F0299.1070508@ti.com> <3449576.YFhSXUYQOn@wuerfel> Message-ID: <20141121161821.GS7046@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Arnd Bergmann [141121 03:17]: > On Friday 21 November 2014 11:15:05 Roger Quadros wrote: > > On 11/21/2014 12:28 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > Just move to drivers as further clean-up can now happen there > > > finally. > > Awesome! > > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/Kconfig | 1 + > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile | 2 +- > > > drivers/bus/Kconfig | 3 +++ > > > drivers/bus/Makefile | 3 ++- > > > arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c => drivers/bus/omap-gpmc.c | 0 > > > 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > rename arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc.c => drivers/bus/omap-gpmc.c (100%) > > > > Should we move it to drivers/memory/ instead? > > TI_AEMIF driver lives there. This is similar to OMAP-GPMC for but for > > Davinci and Keystone platforms. > > Agreed, using drivers/memory sounds better. Good point, I forgot we have separate drivers/memory and drivers/bus. Regards, Tony