From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 17:47:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] i2c: s3c2410: Handle i2c sys_cfg register in i2c driver In-Reply-To: <546F1140.4050709@samsung.com> References: <1414656270-8048-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <1414656270-8048-2-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <20141121072545.GG1480@katana> <546F1140.4050709@samsung.com> Message-ID: <20141121164726.GA1426@katana> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > >I usually don't take DTS patches. They should go via arm-soc. Please say > >so if there are reasons I should take them. > > I CC'ed to you because same patch contains changes in i2c driver. Yes, those should absolutely go via my I2C tree. You need to make a seperate patch out of the dts changes which then also should go via samsung-soc, unless Kukjin says he really wants to go the via I2C. But I guess the latter will just create merge conflicts. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: