From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:10:38 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] memory: gpmc: Move omap gpmc code to live under drivers In-Reply-To: <5475B80A.5010207@ti.com> References: <1416594856-15201-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <1416594856-15201-4-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com> <547301AB.9040905@ti.com> <20141124154403.GB2817@atomide.com> <5475B80A.5010207@ti.com> Message-ID: <20141126201037.GP2817@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Roger Quadros [141126 03:24]: > On 24/11/14 17:44, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Roger Quadros [141124 02:02]: > >> On 11/21/2014 08:34 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>> --- a/drivers/memory/Kconfig > >>> +++ b/drivers/memory/Kconfig > >>> @@ -41,6 +41,14 @@ config TI_EMIF > >>> parameters and other settings during frequency, voltage and > >>> temperature changes > >>> > >>> +config OMAP_GPMC > >>> + bool > >> > >> We should depend on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS. Other platforms won't benefit > >> anything from this driver. > > > > We can't do that yet until we have sorted out the remaining platform > > data issues with arch/arm/mach-omap2/*gpmc*.c files. > > > > So OMAP_GPMC is currently a silent Kconfig option that does not show > > up as the description after the bool is not there, we select > > OMAP_GPMC automatically based on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS. > > > > Once we have the remaining legacy code issues sorted out, we can > > make this into just a regular device driver. > > OK. In that case, > > Acked-by: Roger Quadros Thanks. FYI I did the move now based on what Arnd and I discussed on #armlinux as we were trying to figure out if the earlier gpmc changes should be merged to drivers branch. Arnd, to prettify the diffstats for the arm-soc drivers branch, I've just sent a pull request for these as: "[GIT PULL] move omap gpmc to drivers finally". Regards, Tony