From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 09:20:13 +0100 Subject: [RFC V1 0/8] CPUFreq: create platform-dev for DT based cpufreq drivers In-Reply-To: <3594266.ci9lGXQ9iA@wuerfel> References: <5607434.rlEIdu4yyh@wuerfel> <3594266.ci9lGXQ9iA@wuerfel> Message-ID: <20141202092013.6017a9b0@free-electrons.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Dear Arnd Bergmann, On Mon, 01 Dec 2014 15:59:14 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I still don't see where it does that. All I see for mvebu is > > platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-dt", -1, NULL, 0); > > without any platform data. I see this patch > http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/linaro-kernel/2014-September/017693.html > on the mailing list, but it's not in linux-next, and it obviously > would not work any more with the patch I proposed. Instead I suppose > you would use a different string to match against for the case of > separate clocks. Hum, right. Actually, only the cpufreq driver part has been taken, and I forgot to resubmit the mach-mvebu part of the solution. I'll do so today. Best regards, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com