linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wsa@the-dreams.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] devicetree: bindings: Add defeature-repeated-start property for Cadence I2C
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 13:52:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141202125203.GA4072@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFcVECLtPx6shBXJbg9Uf_8fnhkMoO1zpoxGcdda7PSA7z_2rA@mail.gmail.com>

> >> +  - defeature-repeated-start: Include this property to defeature repeated start
> >> +                           This defeature is due to a few bugs in the
> >> +                           I2C controller.
> >> +                           Completion interrupt after a read/receive
> >> +                           operation is NOT obtained if HOLD bit is set
> >> +                           at that time. Because of this bug, repeated start
> >> +                           will only work if there are no transfers following
> >> +                           a read/receive transfer.
> >> +                           If HOLD is held for long without a transfer,
> >> +                           invalid read transactions are generated by the
> >> +                           controller due to a HW timeout related bug.
> >
> > I'm not keen on the name; it sounds like we're disabling a feature
> > rather than describing the problem (and "defeature" is not a common
> > term in this sense, "disable" would be better).
> >
> > It sounds like there are two issues with staying in the HOLD state? Lost
> > completion IRQs and a separate HW timeout bug? Or are the two related?
> >
> 
> Yes, there are two issues here and they are not related.
> But a combination of both is leading to not using repeated start.
> The intention was to defeature except that it works in some scenarios
> (such as a typical write+read in that order with repeated start)
> and there are people who already use the driver with slaves that need this.

That should not be handled using a binding. If you get a transfer (at
runtime) with criteria you don't support, return with -EOPNOTSUPP from
the master xfer routine.

That being said, the number of broken/not-fully-compliant I2C
controllers has increased a lot recent times (why can't we just use the
established old ones?). Maybe we will have core support for a subset of
I2C (wr+rd) in the future, but that's still ahead...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20141202/a74f9ae5/attachment-0001.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-02 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-02 10:05 [PATCH 0/4] Cadence I2C driver fixes Harini Katakam
2014-12-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 1/4] i2c: cadence: Handle > 252 byte transfers Harini Katakam
2014-12-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 2/4] i2c: cadence: Set the hardware time-out register to maximum value Harini Katakam
2014-12-03 11:28   ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 3/4] devicetree: bindings: Add defeature-repeated-start property for Cadence I2C Harini Katakam
2014-12-02 11:19   ` Mark Rutland
2014-12-02 12:13     ` Harini Katakam
2014-12-02 12:52       ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-12-02 13:10         ` Harini Katakam
2014-12-02 13:16           ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-02 13:30             ` Harini Katakam
2014-12-02 14:15               ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-02 15:12                 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2014-12-02 10:05 ` [PATCH 4/4] i2c: cadence: Defeature repeated start based on devicetree property Harini Katakam
2014-12-02 11:21   ` Mark Rutland

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141202125203.GA4072@katana \
    --to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).