From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: shawn.guo@linaro.org (Shawn Guo)
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2014 23:15:07 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: imx6: fix bogus use of irq_get_irq_data
In-Reply-To: <547DD254.4090704@arm.com>
References: <1417453443-9179-1-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com>
 <20141202144759.GO2411@dragon> <547DD254.4090704@arm.com>
Message-ID: <20141202151505.GP2411@dragon>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 02:53:08PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
> 
> On 02/12/14 14:48, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 05:04:03PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> The imx6 PM code seems to be quite creative in its use of irq_data,
> >> using something something that is very much a hardware interrupt
> >> number where we expect a virtual one.  Yes, it worked so far, but
> >> that's only cheer luck, and it will definitely explode in 3.19.
> >>
> >> Fix it by using a pair of helper functions that deal with the
> >> actual hardware.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
> > 
> > Arnd, Olof,
> > 
> > To avoid a non-booting 3.19-rc1 on i.MX6, please apply it for 3.19-rc1.
> 
> The previous patch (ARM: imx: irq: fix buggy usage of irq_data irq
> field) should also be applied (you cannot apply one without the other
> anyway).

Marc,

Thanks a lot for the fixes.  To ease arm-soc folks' work, you should
probably resend the patches with squashing them into one or having them
in a series.

Shawn