From: jszhang@marvell.com (Jisheng Zhang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] implement arm64_adjust_dma_zone as arm32 does?
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 19:02:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141203190220.4415c21a@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141203102431.GA7373@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Dear Catalin,
On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 02:24:32 -0800
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 09:58:55AM +0000, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > If one platform has one limitation only some banks are DMA-able, for
> > example 0-2GB. Under arm32, we can set the dma_zone_size, then
> > arm_adjust_dma_zone() will set the correct dma zone for us. But under
> > arm64, we can't do it.
>
> Do you really have plans for such platform (and it won't have an IOMMU)
> or it's just theoretical? Currently ZONE_DMA is limited to the bottom
> 32-bit of RAM. The arm32 dma_zone_size relies on the machine descriptors
> which we don't have on arm64.
Thanks for your detailed clarification. Yes, there's plan for such platform and
there's no IOMMU.
>
> > Or set dma-range in dts, then use swiotlb to bounce?
>
> The problem is that swiotlb is only guaranteed to live in the ZONE_DMA,
> so it doesn't buy you much if dma-ranges specify something smaller than
> ZONE_DMA.
oh Yeah!! Thanks for pointing this out which I didn't noticed.
>
> Similarly for CMA (coherent allocations), the reserved CMA area is
> limited to ZONE_DMA (currently 32-bit mask).
Yes, I also considered CMA. The problem with the CMA is not all device
drivers' DMA buffer are allocated from CMA, so swiotlb is the only solution,
right?
>
> > Could you kindly please give one suggestion about how to handle this
> > situation?
>
> First of all I need to know if that's a real case and we don't look into
> it for fun.
>
> What we could do is re-introduce ZONE_DMA32 for 32-bit dma masks and a
> ZONE_DMA for smaller masks. The problem is describing such ZONE_DMA mask
> via DT but very early before we set up the zones. A quick hack would be
> to limit ZONE_DMA to the minimum of 32-bit limit or the end of the first
> memblock, so you describe it as such in DT (but then we penalise
> platforms that can do DMA on all memblocks).
>
We can keep ZONE_DMA32 out from arm64, just describe the ZONE_DMA mask via.
DT as you pointed out, then setup the matching dma zone.
I'm wondering whether setting up ZONE_DMA mask via. DT is acceptable or not?
Thanks,
Jisheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-03 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-03 9:58 [RFC] implement arm64_adjust_dma_zone as arm32 does? Jisheng Zhang
2014-12-03 10:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-03 11:02 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2014-12-03 12:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-12-03 13:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-12-04 10:17 ` Jisheng Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141203190220.4415c21a@xhacker \
--to=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).